Ma won’t stop until
Taiwanese get angry
By James Wang 王景弘
Delight, anger, sorrow and happiness are normal human emotions. However, after
suffering heavy oppression from a foreign colonial government, Taiwanese are
only capable of feeling sorrow and lack the ability to, or do not dare, get
angry.
Despite having no new convincing evidence, the Special Investigation Panel (SIP)
recently and unexpectedly indicted former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝).
Taiwanese should be angry about this instead of just lamenting the sorrows of
being Taiwanese.
If we only feel sorrow when we see those in power carrying out political
persecution, then the poison has gone too deep — we are experiencing the wrong
emotions. People in Middle Eastern and North African nations, such as Egypt,
Yemen, Syria and Libya, who suffered corruption and political persecution for
years under the highly oppressive rule of their dictators reacted not with
sorrow, but with anger. The result was the “Jasmine Revolution.”
In a democracy, anger does not have to lead to revolution because anger can be
expressed peacefully and voters can vote their leaders out of office.
The democratic system that the forefathers of Taiwan’s democracy movement shed
blood and sweat for was established with the aim of creating a fair society in
which everyone has the equality of opportunity. Lee nominated James Soong (宋楚瑜),
now chairman of the People First Party, to run for the now-scrapped position of
Governor of Taiwan Province and teamed up with Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), now
president, to promote the “New Taiwanese” concept. Former president Chen
Shui-bian (陳水扁) appointed Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) politician Tang Fei
(唐飛) as his first premier. These were all strategies aimed at encouraging a
sense of pride in Taiwan while recognizing the different ethnic and political
groups that coexist in the country.
Lee and Chen worked hard to secure Taiwan’s independent status and their actions
had the same goal as the pro-Taiwan policy of “defending Taiwan through reform”
that former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) promoted after the Republic of
China was kicked out of the UN. Now, though, Chen is in jail and Lee has been
indicted.
Taiwanese do not believe that those two former presidents should have immunity
from the judicial process just because they contributed to the establishment of
Taiwan’s democracy and the protection of its sovereignty. However, they firmly
believe that the judiciary should use one set of standards and base all charges
on concrete evidence, and that those with different opinions should not be
persecuted because it suits the interests of those in power.
Ma constantly breaks his promises and he is incompetent. He has betrayed
Taiwan’s sovereignty, stunted its economic growth and caused the gap between
rich and poor to widen. For these things, Taiwanese should be angry.
Ma uses the judiciary as a tool and had nothing to say when members of the Koo
(辜) family who were witnesses in Chen’s case said that prosecutors instructed
them to give false statements. Now Lee has been indicted without any new
evidence being submitted. These actions imply that Ma is out to eliminate
pro-localization leaders. For this, Taiwanese should be angry.
We have seen over the past three years that only a pro--localization government
is capable of enacting reform and upholding Taiwan’s sovereignty and
independence. We must abandon Ma to save Taiwan.
Abandoning Ma and implementing reform to protect Taiwan are two strategies that
will shine brightly in the history of Taiwan’s struggle for sovereignty and
independence.
James Wang is a media commentator.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
|