UN told to drop
ˇĄTaiwan is part of Chinaˇ¦: cable
TERMS OF REFERENCE: Other countries were also
urged to tell the UN that they too were unhappy with its use of terminology when
referring to Taiwan
By J. Michael Cole / Staff Reporter
A number of Western governments, with the US in the lead, protested to the UN in
2007 to force the global body and its secretary-general to stop using the
reference ˇ§Taiwan is a part of China,ˇ¨ a cable recently released by WikiLeaks
shows.
The confidential cable, sent by the USˇ¦ UN mission in New York in August 2007,
said that after returning from a trip abroad, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon
had met then-US ambassador to the UN Zalmay Khalilzad to discuss a range of
issues, including ˇ§UN language on the status of Taiwan.ˇ¨
ˇ§Ban said he realized he had gone too far in his recent public statements, and
confirmed that the UN would no longer use the phrase ˇĄTaiwan is a part of
China,ˇ¦ˇ¨ said the cable, which was sent to the US Department of State and
various US embassies worldwide.
During a meeting with then-California governor Arnold Schwarzenegger on July 27
that year, Ban had defended the UNˇ¦s decision not to accept a renewed attempt by
Taiwan to join the UN on July 23 by saying that UN General Assembly Resolution
2758 asserted that Taiwan was a part of the Peopleˇ¦s Republic of China.
ˇ§Membership is given to a sovereign country. The position of the United Nations
is that the Peopleˇ¦s Republic of China is representing the whole of China as the
sole and legitimate representative Government of China,ˇ¨ Ban had said in
response to a question on Taiwanˇ¦s status. ˇ§The decision until now about the
wish of the people in Taiwan to join the United Nations has been decided on that
basis. The resolution that you just mentioned [2758] is clearly mentioning that
the Government of China is the sole and legitimate Government and the position
of the United Nations is that Taiwan is part of China.ˇ¨
The same month, the US was reported to have presented a nine-point demarche in
the form of a ˇ§non-paperˇ¨ to the then-UN under-secretary-general for political
affairs restating the US view that it took no position on Taiwanˇ¦s sovereignty
and rejected recent UN statements that the world body considers Taiwan for all
intents and purposes to be an integral part of China.
The cable said that the UN missions of Australia, Canada, Japan and New Zealand
had also consulted with the UN on the subject, adding that in reaction to the US
demarche, the Canadian mission had followed with a demarche of its own and
ˇ§received the same commitment that the UN would no longer use the phrase.ˇ¨
It added that Australia had held similar low-level exchanges with the UNˇ¦s
Office of Legal Affairs (OLA), while the Japanese mission had met OLA Assistant
Secretary-General Larry Johnson, who confirmed ˇ§that in his most recent
correspondence on this matter to the correspondence from the Solomon Islands and
Swaziland he had dropped the unhelpful phrase.ˇ¨
The USˇ¦ UN mission also urged New Zealand ˇ§to make clear to the UN that they too
are monitoring the UNˇ¦s terminology and that they share USG [US government]
concerns about the need for increased caution during the presidential campaign
in Taiwan.ˇ¨
|