| 
 2012 ELECTIONS: Watch 
group calls for spying probe 
 
CONCERNS: The allegations that the DPP’s 
presidential candidate has been spied on by government agencies should be 
investigated, an international group urged 
 
By Chris Wang / Staff Reporter 
 
An international election watchdog group yesterday expressed concerns about 
intelligence authorities’ reported monitoring of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) 
presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) in Taiwan’s presidential election and 
called for an immediate and independent investigation into the matter to ensure 
a fair election. 
 
Reported spying on Tsai by the National Security Council (NSC), Taiwan’s top 
intelligence agency, and the Ministry of Justice’s Bureau of Investigation 
“could put Taiwan’s democracy and President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) integrity in 
jeopardy,” the vice chairman of the the International Committee for Fair 
Elections in Taiwan (ICFET), Wu Li-pei (吳澧培), told a press conference in Taipei. 
 
The committee of more than 80 international and domestic politicians, academics 
and democracy advocates was established on Dec. 15 and advocates free and fair 
elections as well as a peaceful transition of power. 
 
The Chinese-language Next Magazine reported on Wednesday that NSC 
Secretary-General Hu Wei-chen (胡為真) had asked the investigation bureau in May to 
monitor Tsai and that it had submitted information it gathered to Ma. 
 
Tsai and the DPP have condemned Ma for the alleged monitoring and asked the 
president for an explanation. 
 
Ma, who is seeking re-election, rejected the report, saying he was not aware of 
the practice and would punish responsible officials if the report turned out to 
be true. 
 
While all reportedly related parties have also denied any illegal monitoring, 
none of them denied the existence of a form that was obtained and published by 
the magazine that details Tsai’s schedules, meetings, contacts and the possible 
number of votes at stake, Wu said. 
 
The alleged monitoring, which the DPP has dubbed “Taiwan’s Watergate,” is 
“actually more serious than the Watergate scandal [in the US] in 1972,” Wu said, 
because active government officials were allegedly involved in this scandal, 
while then-US president Richard Nixon hired former government employees to steal 
information from his opponent. 
 
“ICFET calls on President Ma to immediately order the special prosecutors to 
secure all related documents and material, to form an independent commission to 
conduct a fair investigation of the documents and to conclude the investigation 
before the polling day,” the committee said in a press release. 
 
“If the commission finds that the report is not accurate, President Ma will have 
proven his innocence. And if the commission finds that Ma and the bureau have 
violated the law, Taiwan’s voters will certainly have a better knowledge to make 
their decision on the polling day,” it added. 
 
Joseph Wu (吳釗燮), former Taiwanese representative to the US, said he was 
concerned that Ma had committed identical mistakes to Nixon — capitalizing on 
the state apparatus to spy on political opponents and then lying to cover it up. 
 
Taiwan could learn from the US’ management of Watergate, said DPP Legislator 
Chai Trong-rong (蔡同榮), who serves as the committee’s executive director. This 
included extensive media coverage, the appointment of a special prosecutor, the 
establishment of an independent commission and the president’s eventual 
impeachment by the US Congress, so that public trust in the government would not 
be jeopardized. 
 
However, it was more than the alleged monitoring case that had focused the 
committee’s attention on possible government intervention in the elections. 
 
In the so-called “Yu Chang case,” in which Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) 
lawmakers accused Tsai of wrongdoing in the formation of Yu Chang Biologics Co 
(宇昌生技股份有限公司) — now known as TaiMed Biologics Inc (中裕新藥股份有限公司) — when she served 
as vice premier, a senior government official used an altered document to try to 
discredit Tsai. 
 
Both cases caused concern among international election observers and the 
fairness of the upcoming presidential election has been called into question, 
the committee said. 
 |