|
National defense
policy matters
By Wang Jyh-perng 王志鵬
The campaign for the Jan. 14 presidential election, which is still
neck-and-neck, has included three televised debates between the candidates. It
is regrettable that all three failed to use the debates to present a substantive
and feasible policy platform. Even more worrying, they also apparently lack a
comprehensive and forward-looking national defense policy.
Over the past nearly four years, the weakest link in President Ma Ying-jeou’s
(馬英九) policies has been national defense reform. Here are a few of the 22 policy
items aimed at national defense proposed by Ma and his vice presidential
running-mate, Vincent Siew (蕭萬長), in the 2008 election campaign, and their
results: the plan to complete the transition from a conscription to a voluntary
military in four to six years has been repeatedly postponed because of a lack of
funding; the pledge that the national defense budget would not drop below 3
percent of GDP has not been met in any year; the pledge to maintain the budgets
for military personnel, operations and military investment levels at a ratio of
4:3:3 has never been achieved; the pledge to demand that China dismantle its
missiles aimed at Taiwan have come to naught and the courage to initiate
military exchanges has been lacking.
In addition, after three months of investigating corruption by procurement
officials, not one person has been found to have done anything wrong. At all
past important military occasions, Ma stressed the importance of military morale
— the military’s soft power — but during his presidency, many unexpected events
have occurred without the results of any investigations being made public. Ma’s
exhortations seem to have had no effect.
During the third televised debate between the presidential candidates on Dec.
23, Ma said under his presidency, US arms sales to Taiwan had reached a total of
NT$18.3 billion (US$604 million), 2.12 times more than the NT$8.6 billion
purchased during the eight years of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)
administration.
However, anyone who has worked in the field of military development and
investment planning at the Ministry of National Defense knows that major
military purchases must be included as part of the 10-year military development
plan and the five-year plan to restore military strength. Even if a case is
rushed through, the process takes at least 12 months. Every piece of military
equipment that the US has agreed to sell to Taiwan between May 2008 and today
was planned for during the DPP administration. Some of the equipment were even
items that Ma worked hard to block before he became president.
Would Ma now be willing to list all the major arms procurement plans that were
initiated in the past four years? Taking credit for earlier plans is wrong and
should not be allowed to pass uncriticized.
Ma attends military events as an excuse to co-opt high-ranking retired military
officers. Former army commander-in-chief General Chen Cheng-hsiang (陳鎮湘), who is
currently president of the Alumni Association of the Central Military and
Institutes and Academies of the Republic of China, has called on the nation’s
five biggest veterans’ organizations and all military personnel to forget all
their tears, hate and blood and vote for Ma.
Such methods and comments raise questions about legitimacy and efficacy. When a
retired general comes out in support of Ma, he is expressing only his own
opinion as a member of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), and there are no
substantive data to show how many voters he represents. The reason most retired
soldiers become independent individuals once they retire is because they no
longer want to be involved in military matters or because they have their own
opinions and viewpoints.
The future president will be monitored on the implementation of his or her past
national defense proposals, the effectiveness of their current military reform
efforts and their vision of the future, an issue that was highlighted in an
article on Tuesday by Cheng Chia-wen (程嘉文) in the Chinese-language United Daily
News titled “How much military support will Ma Ying-jeou get?”
A look at DPP presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) defense views shows
that she has failed to offer a correct evaluation of Ma’s defense achievements
over the past four years. Maybe because of economic concerns, she has also been
unable to offer a clear, comprehensive, forward-looking and concrete defense
policy to deal with the cross-strait issue.
The current peaceful and stable cross-strait situation does not mean that we can
afford to ignore the steadily growing military threat posed by China. Even if
Taiwan were to sign a peace accord with China, would that mean that Taiwan could
dissolve its army and would no longer need to defend ourselves?
Whether one subscribes to the political ideology of the pan-blue or the
pan-green camp, defense matters must not be subjected to partisan bickering.
Each presidential candidate must be called upon to propose a visionary and
pragmatic defense policy that is both persuasive and feasible.
Wang Jyh-perng is an associate research fellow at the Association for
Managing Defense and Strategies.
Translated by Perry Svensson
|
