The Liberty Times
Editorial : Legislature needs major shake-up
On Jan. 14, the nation will hold two critical elections ¡X presidential and
legislative ¡X combined on the same day. The hotly contested presidential
election has grabbed most people¡¦s attention, making the choice of legislators
seem like a side issue. However, the truth is that our constitutional system is
a semi-presidential one. The president and the legislature work much like the
wings of a bird ¡X both are of equal importance.
The experience of the past three years shows how undesirable it is to have one
party holding a great majority of seats in the legislature and it tells us that
this situation should not be allowed to continue. Another problem is that
legislators have become akin to local councilors and their policymaking
performance has deteriorated. However, these two trends can only be reversed
through the conscious decisions made by voters at the upcoming polls.
The previous legislative election, in which the members of the current
legislature were elected, was held in January 2008. It was the first election in
Taiwan to employ the system of single-member constituencies, with each voter
having two votes ¡X one for their local representative and one for a party. At
the same time, the number of seats in the legislature was slashed from 225 to
113.
Features of the new system include small constituencies, twin-ballot voting and
a difference in the value of each vote in different areas because of varying
district sizes. The combined effect of these features led to the Chinese
Nationalist Party (KMT) taking 81 seats, or nearly three-quarters of the total,
while the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) won only 38 seats, or less than a
quarter of the total number, even though it received 38.17 percent of votes cast
for legislators and 36.9 percent of the total party vote.
This has prevented the DPP from effectively performing its function as a check
and balance on the KMT government.
The KMT then went on to win the March 2008 presidential election by a margin of
more than 2 million votes. As a result, the KMT has dominated both the
legislature and the executive branch for nearly four years. The KMT government
has acted in a dictatorial fashion and the legislature has been reduced to
little more than a rubber stamp. So much harm has been done to Taiwan¡¦s
democracy and the quality of its legislature that it might take many years to
set things right.
The original intention of reforming the electoral system by adopting
single-member constituencies with voters casting two ballots was to remedy the
faults of the previous system, such as widespread vote buying and extremist
positions taken by candidates in order to get elected. That was the theory, but
things have worked out rather differently in practice.
The KMT is one of the world¡¦s richest political parties and with so much money
kicking around, vote buying has continued under the new system. In fact, some
people say that if you don¡¦t buy votes, you won¡¦t get elected. Not long after
the 2008 elections, a string of elected KMT lawmakers were indicted for vote
buying. Having been found guilty, they lost their seats and went to jail, as a
result of which a series of by-elections had to be held to fill the seats they
had left vacant.
The benefits of the new system have not been as great as was hoped and it has
created quite a few new problems as well. For example, the system has eliminated
small and newly emerging parties from the legislature, depriving them of a
prominent platform and leaving the full variety of public opinion with no way of
being fully expressed.
All these problems show how vitally important the upcoming legislative election
really is.
If voters want to get rid of this situation that is suffocating the nation¡¦s
political scene, there are at least two things that they can do straight away:
First, we have to improve the quality of the legislature and ensure that the
lawmakers who get elected care about national policy and are capable of looking
after the public interest. Some candidates are only interested in local affairs.
Their idea of ¡§serving the public¡¨ is to attend as many weddings and funerals as
they can. These people think of deliberating draft laws and examining budgets as
a secondary aspect of their job, so they pay scant attention to their
legislative duties.
With lawmakers like this, the legislature is starting to look more like a
glorified local council. It is time for everyone to rethink what is expected of
our elected representatives and Taiwanese should take care to vote for people
who really know how to work on policy ¡X people who can take on the arduous, but
vital task of thoroughly reforming the legislature.
If this doesn¡¦t happen, our legislature will continue to be dysfunctional and a
source of turmoil. In that case, even if we halved the number of legislators
again, it still would not fix the problem.
The second thing to bear in mind is that, as the saying goes, people will do
anything for a profit, but nobody wants to work for a loss. Smart voters must be
aware that candidates who spend vast amounts of money to buy votes at election
time will want to find ways of getting their investment back after they get
voted into office.
If a political party spends vast sums of money on posting, publishing and
broadcasting advertisements all over the place to influence the public, is it
going to patiently listen to public opinion and follow democratic procedures
after it has been elected? If a party can safely assume that it will remain in
government on the basis of its immense wealth, no matter how good or lousy a job
it does, then politicians will not have much motivation to stop going from bad
to worse.
If you report vote buying, you can claim a government reward, but Taiwanese
should also have the guts to do more than that and make sure rotten politicians
do not get voted in. Cutting out the malignancy will shorten the period of pain
for the nation¡¦s democracy and stop the cozy collaboration between an
incompetent executive branch and an equally useless legislature.
A recent opinion piece in Foreign Policy listed Taiwan¡¦s legislature as among
some of the most dysfunctional parliaments in democratic countries around the
world. Considering that the KMT holds a majority of seats in the legislature,
surely it should shoulder the greater part of the blame for this dubious honor.
If Taiwan¡¦s legislature is among the worst, how can its government ever get any
better?
If Taiwanese do not want their country to be an international laughing stock
anymore, we need to make some big changes, and the crucial time for making those
changes is now.
Translated by Julian Clegg
|