What kind of Taiwan
is ¡¥next?¡¦
By Engelber Altenburger ¥j³ù
Will the socioeconomic and political situation further depress the ¡§next¡¨
Taiwan, or will it regain hope and resurge as a paradigmatic island?
A multifaceted ¡§Taiwan of despair¡¨ has replaced a once exemplary Formosa shaped
by a decades-old economic miracle. Globalization, affluence and waste now reign
among an impoverishment, marginalization and isolation that natives struggle to
explain, while foreigners are excluded from any meaningful commentary.
One source of despair for outsiders is the literal incomprehension of a country
where nature and human environment are beyond tangible singularity. A recent
case was the assault on a foreigner in Taipei (Letters, Dec. 21 and Dec. 25,
page 8; ¡§Clashes of cultures and personalities,¡¨ Dec. 30, page 8).
The kind of assault that happened in Taipei may not necessarily occur elsewhere
in Taiwan. ¡§Aliens¡¨ may become the victims of offenders who have themselves been
traumatized by hostile encounters. Taiwan has produced a society split into
individualistic groups, in which consensus and national solidarity have been
replaced by an underworld that is best not compared to that of Sicily. The
infringement of group norms (as defined by behaviorist Irenaus Eibl-Eibesfeldt)
easily leads to unpredictable violence.
Taiwan¡¦s natural environment, already wasted by ¡§civilization¡¨ is replete with
danger ¡X a biosphere with poisonous life; landslides tearing off mountain
slopes, roads and villages; torrential floods devastating valuable land ¡X
pushing ever more people to the verge of despair. With this in mind the author
condones some of his own unhappy experiences: such as an unintentional
involvement with a gravel truck and the ensuing humiliating treatment at the
hands of the authorities, who just couldn¡¦t communicate with an adoga (big
nose). Or one unprovoked physical attack, which reminded a Taiwanese friend of
his own experience on a tour of Europe, where he said he had encountered genuine
racist xenophobia.
At the time Europeans were establishing a foothold in the New World and their
cultures transforming the Americas into modern Western nation states, Han
migrants arrived in Taiwan and extended China¡¦s cultural space into the Pacific.
Although Western politics and alliances have preserved the Ilha Formosa in the
20th century as a display window of an intangible China, they have as much
failed to create a nation state as they have fallen short of comprehending the
Sinicized country or in introducing Western values as an antithesis to the
ancient awe-inspiring beliefs that thrive in people¡¦s souls and untold temples,
along with popular superstitions and unfathomable fears.
Among the fears that foreigners will probably never understand is demonophobia ¡X
a fear of the ¡§undead;¡¨ which in stress situations may trigger violence in a
society polarized and haunted by angst and unrest. On the other hand, Taiwanese
have long since proven that bravery is fostered by universal philanthropy and
the harmonious coexistence of different ethical systems, languages, cultures,
opinions and ideas. This makes the kind of xenophobia known by foreigners
obsolete, although an essential fear (from the Greek, phobos) of what is
different (xenos, for the unknown person) remains. It may also be this fear
which, ironically, gives people a blind admiration for the strange.
This peculiar insular behavior may derive from the necessity to be open to and
to absorb anything ¡§strange¡¨ (the first Europeans on Easter Island were welcomed
by the Austronesians as gods). However, the range of xenophobia which is
occasionally seen in the more polluted and overpopulated areas is as limited as
Taiwan¡¦s living space. The opposite may be found in the countryside, where
hard-working farmers welcome any stranger, and may even teach him the lesson
that Marie Curie, twice winner of the Nobel Prize, made one of her principles:
¡§I do not think about things that have already been done. I am interested only
in things which remain to be done.¡¨
Does the slogan ¡§Taiwan next¡¨ also retain this concept, by eulogizing the two
vital values of solidarity and justice? Will these be feasible in a pluralistic
and developing Asian democracy that on one side is obsessively split, stuck in a
gap between underdeveloped and overdeveloped fringes, lingering between poverty
and luxury, and on the other side seemingly deadlocked in hopelessness?
A Taiwan with no resources and yet so wasteful (millions of dollars once again
blown into the air on New Year as fireworks transformed hard-earned wealth into
smoke and mirrors) is reminiscent of a quotation by Adam Smith from his book The
Wealth of Nations: ¡§All over Europe there is a high increase in debts which can
be seen as a heavy-handed term in all important nations today and will lead in
all probability to economic ruin.¡¨ That was in 1776, the year the US declared
independence.
Jerry Lai, in an analysis of Taiwan¡¦s government, economy, society and education
(Commonwealth Magazine, December 2011) said Taiwan¡¦s faith in herself and
foreigners¡¦ trust in her has declined, with entrepreneurs relocating production
to low-cost countries ¡X China in particular. As the young generation is left
with no hope for the future, most of the 100,000 or more students that graduate
annually from 170 universities and colleges don¡¦t even ask where they are going.
Many of them are graduating without any skills, with meaningless certificates
good enough to get a job, but not good enough to start a profession.
The warning of a societal implosion must be taken seriously, because it comes
from the heart of the nation. Foreigners, by contrast, might never understand
the totally different society of a physically and culturally isolated ¡§other
world.¡¨ Thus they are left with tired cliches, such as pointing to principles
that are especially unpopular for politicians at re-election time, like ¡§do not
spend more money than you have on hand ¡X on policy, economy or private
households.¡¨
The sky is the only limit for Taiwan¡¦s future. Its socioeconomic and political
situation is as likely to improve as it is to worsen or collapse ¡X just like the
euro zone or the ¡§great empires.¡¨ Despair and paradigms stand close together,
governed by an invisible thread rather than by coordinated organizations or
standards.
Engelbert Altenburger is an associate professor of international business at
I-Shou University.
|