|
No set stance on beef
imports, Ma says
DOUBLE STANDARD: A DPP legislator questioned why
Ma would feel differently about ractopamine in beef, since Ma openly opposed the
chemical’s presence in pork in 2008
By Chris Wang / Staff Reporter
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) yesterday said his administration has no
predetermined position or timetable regarding the importation of controversial
US beef products, despite speculation of a possible policy change by the
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
“We have always maintained the same position as US officials — that Taiwanese
have concerns about US beef imports and the use of ractopamine,” Ma said at a
press conference for the handover of the premiership.
Ma said the US beef issue is not new as Taipei had been engaged in a dispute
with Washington over the importation of offal two years ago and more recently
the two have sparred over the use of ractopamine.
He said candid communication with the public has always been his priority when
dealing with the US beef issue.
The president said he had asked the Council of Agriculture, the Ministry of
Economic Affairs and the Department of Health to seek a public consensus and use
scientific data to reach a final assessment regarding the presence of
ractopamine in food products.
Premier Sean Chen , who officially assumed the position yesterday, said an
inter-agency task force — led by Council of Agriculture Minister Chen Bao-ji
(陳保基) and comprised of representatives from the Environmental Protection
Administration, the ministry and the Consumer Protection Committee — would be
established to tackle the issue.
Earlier yesterday, the DPP said the Ma administration owes it to Taiwanese to
provide a clear explanation of its position on the controversial issue.
“The DPP urges Ma to clearly explain his position and any possible policy
changes regarding the importation of US beef,” DPP spokesperson Lo Chih-cheng
(羅致政) said.
Lo said the Ma administration has failed to disclose its official position on
the controversial topic, adding that government officials had sent conflicting
messages about whether beef imports were linked with the resumption of bilateral
trade talks with Washington under the Trade and Investment Framework Agreement (TIFA).
The ministry said it was not aware that the two issues were linked, while
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Vice Chairman John Chiang (蔣孝嚴) said during his
visit to Washington for the National Prayer Breakfast that beef imports were
connected to the TIFA talks, Lo said.
Lo said the DPP’s position has been clear and remained the same as in 2009,
adding that the party is not necessarily opposed to expanded US beef imports,
but it demands an explanation about any policy change from the government.
“Taiwanese are entitled to know why the restriction would be relaxed and why the
policy would be adjusted,” he said.
Lo said the DPP understands that the US beef issue would be influenced by
politics and “give-and-take in bilateral negotiation,” and that the Ma
administration could make concessions on the beef issue in exchange for the
resumption of TIFA talks.
“However, we would also like to know what Taiwan would get for lifting the
import ban. Will it only be the resumption of trade negotiations, or will it be
a guarantee to complete the TIFA negotiations?” Lo said.
The DPP legislative caucus also expressed concerns about a possible policy
change and the current administration’s ability to handle the issue at a press
conference yesterday morning.
DPP Legislator Chen Ting-fei (陳庭妃) said during Ma’s 2008 presidential bid that
he campaigned on his opposition to the importation of US pork containing
ractopamine, and Chen questioned why Ma would suddenly have no problem with the
importation of US beef containing ractopamine.
Chen said Ma is obligated to clearly explain his position on the controversial
policy because during the recent presidential campaign Ma said the beef issue
was not linked with the US visa-waiver program and the resumption of the TIFA
talks.
|
