| 
 EDITORIAL: Beijing 
and media manipulation 
 
Beijing has reportedly drafted new policy guidelines for cross-strait relations 
that include reaching out to those who do not support the Chinese Nationalist 
Party (KMT), trying to exert more influence over the Taiwanese media and helping 
Taiwanese companies in China improve their operations. The trouble is, Beijing 
has already proven its ability to exert a great deal of influence over Taiwan¡¦s 
media, and while its methods may be changing, the goal remains the same: 
annexation. 
 
These new policies were reportedly the result of several brainstorming sessions 
among those in the Taiwan Affairs Office and others in charge of cross-strait 
affairs in the wake of Taiwan¡¦s Jan. 14 elections and were supposedly in play 
during the recent visit by Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits 
Deputy Chairman Zheng Lizhong (¾G¥ß¤¤), which focused on the pro-green areas of 
southern Taiwan. 
 
China has been ramping up its media manipulation ever since the Economic 
Cooperation Framework Agreement was signed in June 2010. On Monday, the 
Foundation for the Advancement of Media Excellence noted that some Taiwanese 
newspapers had run news stories from China¡¦s state media and published news 
reports paid for by China without informing their readers, with about 200 ¡§ads¡¨ 
paid for by Chinese government agencies published in local newspapers last year. 
 
The KMT government hasn¡¦t complained or tried to take action because it is doing 
the same thing, with the foundation noting that the five biggest newspapers 
published more than 1,300 ¡§ads¡¨ for the government in the second half of last 
year alone. 
 
However, Beijing¡¦s interest in additional manipulation of Taiwanese media has 
been sparked by its belief that local media outlets¡¦ coverage helped convince 
many Taiwanese to support the so-called ¡§1992 consensus¡¨ during the January 
elections, the Chinese-language United Daily News cited sources as saying. 
 
Being able to determine the source of news is crucial to being an informed 
consumer and informed voter, and efforts by Beijing ¡X or the KMT government ¡X to 
hide their sponsorship of self-serving news articles and reports are despicable, 
and downright deadly to society, because the message that annexation is 
inevitable could easily become a drumbeat that few can march against. 
 
No one should be in doubt of China¡¦s intentions, even if it pretends to be 
playing nicer. Just ask the Chinese where playing nice will get them. 
 
The Chinese were told this week the government plans to soften the slogans local 
authorities have used to push Beijing¡¦s ¡§one-child¡¨ policy. Instead of being 
told ¡§We would rather scrape your womb than allow you to have a second child¡¨ or 
¡§If you don¡¦t have your tubes tied, your house will be demolished,¡¨ they will 
hear ¡§Caring for a girl means caring for the future of the nation,¡¨ the Shanghai 
Daily reported. 
 
The paper said the National Population and Family Planning Commission wants to 
prevent zealous officials from ¡§offending the public¡¨ or worsening social 
tensions. 
 
The actual policy that has encouraged local family planning officials to use 
draconian measures, including forced late-term abortions, sterilization and 
monetary fines, to enforce the one-child policy is not being changed ¡X nor are 
the quotas and targets that those officials have to meet ¡X just the public 
facade is being polished. 
 
That¡¦s what Beijing is all about ¡X its facade. Right now it is all about not 
¡§offending the public¡¨ or worsening social tensions both at home and in Taiwan. 
Which is why it is so important for the public to keep pushing the media into 
doing their job to probe behind China¡¦s friendly facade and to protest at paid 
coverage. To trust the message, you have to be able to trust the messenger, and 
right now there is no reason to do so. 
 |