| 
 EDITORIAL: 
Post-election, the floodgates open 
 
Taiwan has had a tough few weeks, with doom and gloom dominating the news: 
ractopamine-laced beef imports, government officials covering up an H5N2 avian 
influenza outbreak, chicken culls in central and southern Taiwan, and now tests 
revealing high levels of food additives in pork products. 
 
With beef, chicken and pork off the menu, what is left that’s safe to eat? 
 
Next up was this week’s news about price increases. The price of oil has been 
increasing for six weeks in a row, utility bills are set to rise, university 
fees look set to go up and now even the guaranteed health insurance premium that 
legislators fought so hard for, and that former Department of Health minister 
Yaung Chih-liang (楊志良) staked his government post on, is suddenly going to 
change. 
 
The new Cabinet has been beset by a barrage of political storms. The opposition 
has chided it for presiding over these price rises, saying this is not a Cabinet 
of peace and security, but “a government of price rises and a Cabinet of 
insecurity.” 
 
Before President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) second term has even started, Premier Sean 
Chen’s honeymoon period is already over, with his popularity rating below 40 
percent. 
 
You could have seen all this coming. Before the election, Ma suppressed any 
controversial policies that might prove unpopular with the electorate and dent 
his chances of re-election. Far better, he thought, to sweep problematic issues 
like the avian flu outbreak, US beef imports, and oil and utility price rises 
under the carpet until after the election. 
 
Taiwan Power Co says it is sitting on an aggregate loss of NT$117 billion 
(US$3.96 billion) this year and if it does not increase prices it is looking at 
further losses of more than NT$100 billion next year. If it comes to this, the 
company will have incurred an aggregate loss of more than half its paid-in 
capital of NT$330 billion. According to Article 211 of the Company Act (公司法) the 
board of directors has to convene a meeting and report to shareholders should 
such a scenario arise. 
 
The article says: “Subject to the provisions set out in Article 282 of this Act, 
in case the assets of a company is insufficient to set off its liabilities, the 
board of directors shall apply to the court for pronouncement of its 
bankruptcy.” 
 
CPC Corp, Taiwan (CPC) is in the same boat. Last year it had an aggregate loss 
of NT$36 billion, and if oil prices do not return to normal levels this year and 
the company continues to apply its cut-price policy, it will see a further loss 
of NT$60 billion. Given that CPC’s paid-in capital is NT$130 billion, it is set 
to come up against the same problem with Article 211 next year. 
 
Nobody wants to see prices rise. Each increase might just mean an extra NT$100 
per bill, but if many bills rise by this amount it all adds up. One could always 
try to tighten one’s belt and pull in the purse strings, but this just adds to 
all the other misery that seems to have come to a head. Also, it is a bit rich 
for politicians to come on all caring and considerate before the election, 
shoring up the levee to hold back the threatened deluge, only to saunter off and 
allow the flood to come crashing through when the election is over. 
 
Voters are not unreasonable, they will understand so long as the government 
provides figures and lets them weigh up the pros and cons. What we have had 
instead is various government departments making announcements about policies 
they have already decided, but for which they are unable to provide accurate and 
reasonable figures. 
 
The government bluffed before the election and it has bungled after it. First it 
wanted our votes, now it wants our money, and the electorate cannot do anything 
about it. All voters can do is wonder why they had not seen this coming before 
they voted for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) to stay in power. 
 |