|
MA’S RE-INAUGURATION:
Opposition voices displeasure with president’s speech
By Chris Wang and Shih Hsiu-chuan / Staff reporters
Opposition parties in both camps yesterday sniped at President Ma Ying-jeou
(馬英九) for an inauguration speech they said came well short of meeting people’s
expectations.
Leading the attacks, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) said Ma’s speech
turned a deaf ear to public discontent with his policies and said it would
launch a no-confidence motion against the Cabinet, as well as a series of recall
attempts.
DPP interim chairperson Chen Chu (陳菊) told a press conference at the legislature
that DPP lawmakers would launch a motion of no confidence and demand a complete
reshuffle of the Cabinet after the Ma administration announced that all top
Cabinet members would be retained.
In his inauguration address, Ma neither apologized nor responded to public anger
toward his decisions to raise fuel and electricity prices and to favor relaxing
a ban on imports of beef containing the livestock feed additive ractopamine,
despite tens of thousands of people protesting on Saturday, Chen said.
Ma answered the public by deciding to keep Premier Sean Chen and retain almost
all Cabinet members, she said.
“As an opposition party, the DPP will do whatever it takes to monitor the
president, who has taken his own course without considering the public’s
well-being and the country’s future,” Chen Chu said.
To maintain accountability, the party would launch a motion of no confidence to
demand Sean Chen’s ouster and it would fully back the attempt to recall
legislators who supported relaxing or lifting the ractopamine ban, she said.
Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) Chairman Huang Kun-huei (黃昆輝) said his party would
launch a two-year, three-stage plan to recall three Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)
mayors, KMT lawmakers and the president.
Huang criticized Ma’s inclusion of the “one country, two areas (一國兩區)” proposal
in his speech, saying that the proposal and the “fictitious ‘1992 consensus’”
would place Taiwan under the “one China framework” in Beijing’s favor, which
would be treasonable.
Huang suspected that Ma is ready to promote unification with China in his second
four-year term.
“That would be Taiwanese people’s biggest nightmare,” he said, adding that Ma
disqualified himself as a national leader for his non-recognition of Taiwan’s
sovereignty and his claim that the land area encompassed in the People’s
Republic of China (PRC) is part of the territory of the Republic of China.
The TSU has laid out a three-stage plan to recall KMT politicians, Huang said.
The party would immediately work on attempts to recall the mayors of Taipei, New
Taipei City (新北市) and Greater Taichung, followed by moves to recall various KMT
lawmakers in February next year and Ma one year into his second term in May next
year, as the law stipulates that elected officials and representatives could not
be recalled before serving out a year into their terms.
Former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) also criticized Ma’s mention of the
so-called “1992 consensus” and “one country, two areas” in a message posted on
his Facebook page as “irresponsible” and “a distortion of history.”
Lee, 89, said he had twice defined cross-strait relations as “special
state-to-state relations” in 1999 when he was president.
The idea of “two areas” came out of nowhere since Taiwan does not include the
PRC, Lee wrote.
The Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the
Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例) is a domestic law that does not provide a legal
basis to interpret the cross-strait status, Lee said.
While Beijing has never accepted the “one China with different interpretations”
as imagined in the so-called “1992 consensus,” Ma’s recognition of “one China”
jeopardizes Taiwan’s sovereignty and the re-emergence of authoritarianism, Lee
added.
Meanwhile, the smaller pan-blue People First Party (PFP) also said it was
dissatisfied with Ma’s speech.
“It was a total failure,” PFP Legislator Thomas Lee (李桐豪) told a press
conference.
The PFP urged Ma to deliver a national report to the legislature at the earliest
possible time and to be more receptive to public opinion.
“If [Ma] doesn’t change his way of doing things, the PFP does not rule out the
possibility of initiating a recall campaign in one year,” he said.
“We did not see him reflect on his past mistakes, nor did we see him apologize
and make a change for the better” in the inauguration speech, Thomas Lee said.
“For the future, he proposed only rhetoric and did not outline any vision,” he
added.
Thomas Lee did not give an affirmative response as to whether the PFP would
support the DPP’s motion to seek a no-confidence vote against the Cabinet.
“We do not exclude the possibility of toppling the Cabinet, but we need to think
about the timing,” Lee said.
KMT Legislator Lo Shu-lei (羅淑蕾), who has been critical of the Ma administration,
said that by and large she agreed with the direction Ma had set for the country,
but “the point is how to implement his policy.”
KMT Legislator Wu Yu-sheng (吳育昇) said the party caucus would spare no effort to
block a no--confidence vote as the move was just a political gesture.
“We should give the [Sean] Chen Cabinet more time to prove itself,” Wu said.
Executive Yuan spokesperson Hu Yu-wei (胡幼偉) said the premier was aware of the
DPP proposal, but that his attention remained focused on livelihood issues,
particularly the floods in Greater Tainan.
|
