|
Executive order on
beef issue proposed
STALEMATE: As the DPP’s boycott of the
legislature drags on, KMT lawmakers appear divided by efforts to ease a ban on
beef imports that contain ractopamine
By Shih Hsiu-chuan and Chris Wang / Staff reporters
Members of the governing and
opposition parties yesterday face off in the legislature, which remains in
gridlock over contentious government policies.
Photo: George Tsorng, Taipei Times
Amid the opposition’s filibuster of a vote
on a bill that would allow imports of US beef containing the livestock feed
additive ractopamine, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers yesterday
demanded that the executive branch go ahead and ease the import ban by executive
order.
If the opposition’s boycott of legislative proceedings continues today — the
final day of the current legislative session — the Executive Yuan should lift
the import ban via an executive order, KMT caucus whip Wu Yu-sheng (吳育昇) told a
press conference yesterday morning.
However, two other KMT caucus whips, Lin Hung-chih (林鴻池) and Hsu Yao-chang
(徐耀昌), later said the idea had been proposed by KMT Legislator Chiang Nai-shin
(蔣乃辛), adding that it was Chiang’s “personal view.”
Hsu said the KMT caucus’ position on the beef issue “remained unchanged” — that
a vote on an amendment to the Act Governing Food Sanitation (食品衛生管理法) has to be
held in this session to conditionally lift the ban.
However, KMT Legislator Chiang Hui-chen (江惠貞) was one of the KMT lawmakers who
are in favor of Chiang Nai-shin’s idea.
“It is fine that the executive branch respect lawmakers and values our views,
but the executive branch is not supposed to let the legislative branch make each
and every policy decision,” Chiang Hui-chen said.
The split in opinion on the use of an executive order was the latest division
among KMT lawmakers over the beef issue after President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九)
proposed lifting the ban, which he said would facilitate a resumption of talks
with the US under the Trade and Investment Framework Agreement.
Despite repeated calls by Ma, as KMT chairman, for party lawmakers to toe the
line, some KMT lawmakers are hesitant to endorse the policy because of public
opposition to easing the ban and the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP)
threats to initiate recall campaigns against KMT lawmakers who vote for the
amendment.
“If the [executive branch] wants our cooperation in revising the Act Governing
Food Sanitation, it must present adequate reasons why we have to lift the ban
and provide evidence of the safety of beef containing ractopamine residue,” said
KMT Legislator Cheng Ju-fen (鄭汝芬), who opposes the use of ractopamine as a feed
additive.
Given that the executive branch is entitled by Article 11 of the Act Governing
Food Sanitation to determine safe levels of drug residues, it is within the
scope of its authority to revise the zero-tolerance policy on ractopamine, she
said.
The division within the KMT over the beef issue has limited the party’s ability
to ram the amendment through the legislature, KMT Legislator Lo Shu-lei (羅淑蕾)
said.
“It was a mistake for the government to try to revise the Act Governing Food
Sanitation to lift the ban. Not only because it was redundant, but it also
brought lawmakers under pressure from their constituents,” KMT Legislator Alex
Tsai (蔡正元) said.
Tsai said Ma “might as well have announced he was lifting the ban” earlier this
year based on the votes he earned in his re-election.
“What’s the point of him [Ma] dragging KMT lawmakers down? He should face up to
the issue himself,” Tsai said.
However, Executive Yuan spokesperson Hu Yu-wei (胡幼偉) said the government still
wanted the legislature to pass the amendment this session.
Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) did not offer any suggestions yesterday
on resolving the gridlock except to say that he did not want to see the
situation evolve into physical conflicts among lawmakers
Meanwhile, DPP Legislator Pan Men-an (潘孟安) said the DPP caucus was opposed to an
executive order lifting the ban “because executive orders are not above the
law.”
“If they are, the existence of the Legislative Yuan would be meaningless,” he
added.
Beta agonists are still listed as illicit drugs under the Veterinary Drugs
Control Act (動物用藥品管理法) so it is hard to figure out why one of them, ractopamine,
would be allowed in human food, Pan said.
Pan said the KMT caucus and the Executive Yuan are both trying to evade
responsibility for the decision to ease the ban.
DPP Legislator Huang Wei-cher (黃偉哲) said Ma’s insistence on having the issue
resolved by today was “very suspicious” because the UN Codex Alimentarius
Commission, which develops international standards for food, was scheduled to
discuss the maximum residue levels for ractopamine in its July 2 meeting.
“Ma could wait until the results [of that meeting] before making a final
decision, that would be more persuasive to Taiwanese,” Huang said.
The legislature was idled for a fourth straight day yesterday by the DPP’s
protest, but the atmosphere in the chamber was relaxed for the DPP lawmakers
occupying and guarding the podium after the KMT caucus decided against an
“invasion.”
In response to KMT criticism that the DPP had squandered millions of taxpayer’s
dollars with its boycott as well as the KMT caucus’ NT$2 million donation of
their salaries for this week as a disaster relief fund, Pan said the DPP
lawmakers had been in the assembly room waiting for the beginning of the plenary
session and the vote.
“Those who were not in the room were KMT legislators, not us,” he said.
The Taiwan Solidarity Union said its three lawmakers would support the DPP’s
boycott to the very last minute and that it was opposed to resolving the beef
issued through and executive order as well.
|
