|
EDITORIAL: PRC¡¦s
religious freedom not for all
The People¡¦s Republic of China (PRC) likes to promote that its constitution
enshrines freedom of religion, as well as the freedom not to believe in a
religion, and bans discrimination on the grounds of religion or lack thereof.
The important ¡X but unstated ¡X caveat is that religion must be state-sanctioned.
The PRC also likes to send delegations to international events, including
religious gatherings. However, it is often reluctant to play by the rules of
such gatherings (as Taiwanese know all too well), a tendency it demonstrated
once again this week when 17 Chinese delegates left the South Korean city of
Yeosu in a huff because they had not been able to get the World Fellowship of
Buddhists (WFB) to toss out a delegation of Tibetan Buddhists from a biannual
gathering.
The WFB was founded in May 1950 to bring together representatives of different
Buddhists sects, be they of the Theravada, Mahayana or Vajrayana traditions,
and, quoting from the fellowship¡¦s Web site: ¡§To secure unity, solidarity and
brotherhood amongst Buddhists.¡¨
Chinese delegations have attended other WFB gatherings where Tibetan delegations
were present, such as the previous one, held in Sri Lanka. The problem this
time, apparently, was the make-up of the Tibetan delegation, which included
Samdhong Rinpoche, a monk and former prime minister of the Tibetan
government-in-exile, and Peme Chhinjor, minister of religion and culture in the
government and the most senior member of the Cabinet.
On Tuesday, three Tibetan delegates were forced to leave a delegates¡¦ assembly
meeting after the Chinese threatened to boycott it and the WFB secretary-general
conceded China¡¦s demand, but on Tuesday night it was the Chinese who walked out
of the opening ceremony because the Tibetans refused to leave. The Chinese said
they did not want to share the same venue as people they said represented the
Tibetan government-in-exile.
Chhinjor told the Korea Herald that organizers had asked him to go outside
because of the Chinese complaints, but he refused because he had been invited by
the conference organizers, he is a member of the WFB and ¡§this is [South] Korea,
not Beijing.¡¨ He also downplayed the incident, saying it was ¡§Nothing so
special, Chinese are always like that.¡¨
What was special was the reaction of the event¡¦s organizers, the Jogye Order of
Korean Buddhism, who accused the Chinese delegation of ¡§lacking the least
respect and consideration¡¨ for a religious event. While saying the departure of
the Chinese was regrettable, the order said in a statement that: ¡§The Chinese
delegates only prioritized their own political agenda by refusing to accept the
presence of a Tibetan delegation officially registered as a member of the WFB.¡¨
The statement went on to demand a sincere apology from the Chinese delegation
and a promise that such an incident would never happen again. The Jogye Order
also said it sympathized with the religious activities of Tibetan Buddhists and
would ¡§seriously reconsider¡¨ ties with Chinese Buddhists.
The Chinese delegates may not have had much of a say in the matter, given that
media reports of their departure noted that they left in a vehicle provided by
the Chinese embassy in South Korea. It is highly likely that Chinese embassy
officials demanded they toe the party line and leave once it became clear that
they would not be able to bully the conference organizers into ousting the
Tibetans. Nevertheless, their show of pique does no credit to the Chinese claims
of freedom of religion.
So three cheers to the Jogye Order for living up to the WFB¡¦s goals of showing
solidarity and brotherhood among Buddhists by defending the right of members of
the WFB to participate in the organization¡¦s activities regardless of their
political affiliation. Three jeers to the Chinese delegation ¡X made up of monks
and ¡§Buddhist officials¡¨ ¡X for not being willing to acknowledge the brotherhood
of their coreligionists. They obviously have yet to learn what freedom of
religion truly means.
|
