|
Editorial: Lessons
for Taiwan from Quebec
The Parti Quebecois¡¦ (PQ) victory in Tuesday¡¦s snap election in the
predominantly French-speaking Canadian province will likely embolden some
supporters of Taiwanese independence, as it usually does when the separatist
movement takes power, to draw parallels in their struggle for nationhood.
While it may be tempting to regard events in Canada as a source of inspiration,
the Quebec experience is a bad template for Taiwan¡¦s struggle against Chinese
encroachment and therefore should not be used as an analogy.
Above all, unlike Taiwan, Quebec is part of a federal system whose ¡§colonial¡¨
power that the separatists have been struggling against is democratic,
officially bilingual and does not threaten to use force or unleash paramilitary
columns if they do not behave. Contrary to China, Ottawa does not brandish 1,600
ballistic missiles at the province¡¦s 6.1 million people, nor does it have a
so-called law that would legitimize the use of force against it should its
people decide to secede, which they have tried to do twice through referendums.
Canada does not curtail the human rights of Quebecers or undermine their freedom
of expression, though authoritarian China does so to Taiwan. Finally, unlike
Taiwan, Quebec shares land geography with Canada and has not had the privilege
of 117 years of separate existence that the island-nation has had since the
Japanese took over in 1895 (not to mention the time before that).
The object here is not to pass judgement on the validity of the claims made by
Quebec separatists or whether Taiwan is more deserving of independence than
Quebec. The point is that the two conflicts are idiosyncratic and as such serve
as poor templates for one another.
Still, politicians and pundits in Taiwan will sometimes argue the case for
independence along ¡§ethnic¡¨ and ¡§linguistic¡¨ lines, and in that aspect, Taiwan
can learn from the PQ¡¦s experience, primarily to find out how not to behave.
The PQ leader and Quebec¡¦s first female premier, Pauline Marois, has among other
things proposed to expand the province¡¦s language Law 101 that prevents
francophones and immigrants from attending English-language junior colleges, and
seeks to introduce a law that would make it impossible for non-French speakers
to run for office.
In comments that echo Jacques Parizeau, an openly xenophobic former PQ leader
who blamed the failure of the province¡¦s second referendum in 1995 on the
¡§ethnic vote,¡¨ Marois has also said (in French, of course) that it is the
responsibility of everyone who wishes to call Quebec their home to learn and
assimilate to the local culture, not to replace it with their own. For a party
that equates language with cultural identity, this raises serious questions
about whether the 20 percent or so of people who live in Quebec and who are not
francophones continue to be welcome there under the pequistes.
Adopting such an ideology is not only a step backward for a multiethnic and
immigrant society like Quebec¡¦s, but risks exacerbating tensions between
Anglophones and francophones, while encouraging extremists, like the 62-year-old
man who shot and killed a person during Marois¡¦ victory speech in Montreal, who
fear the PQ will make them second-class citizens and no longer part of Quebec
society. The term assimilation immediately brings to mind extreme rightists like
Jean-Marie Le Pen in France or the late Joerg Haider of Austria, and goes
against the reality of the modern world, where cultures do not replace one
another in a zero-sum game, but rather evolve and become richer as a result of
interaction.
If there is one thing that Taiwan should learn from the Quebec experience as it
attempts to define itself and devise a strategy for its future it is that
inclusiveness and tolerance, not destructive exclusiveness a la PQ, is the way
to form a vibrant and stable society. For that alone, thank you Mademoiselle
Marois for showing Taiwan the road that should not be taken.
|
