|
EDITORIAL: Symbols
are China’s Achilles’ heel
There is something about art and symbols that really gets under the skin of
Chinese Communist Party officials and makes them behave in ways that even they
must know is against their self-interest.
This is exemplified by the deplorable decision made during the London Olympics
this summer to take down the Republic of China flag from Regent Street after
Chinese representatives in the UK pressured British officials to do so. Chinese
officials apparently could not bear the idea that a symbol of Taiwanese
nationhood, disagreeable though it may be to some Taiwanese, could flutter
alongside the flags of other nations. However, rather than strengthen China’s
interests, the move damaged its image while bringing into full contrast the
reasons why Taiwan is not — and cannot be — part of China. The controversy
received substantial coverage in the media, especially after hundreds of young
people bearing flags gathered on Regent Street for various photo ops.
Over the years, Chinese officials, sports coaches and students have constantly
lost their senses over art, images, films and other manifestations of freedom,
ripping flags, boycotting festivals and sometimes resorting to physical
violence. It is hard to tell whether this instinctive reaction to symbols stems
from growing up in a society where propagandistic images played such a powerful
role in cultivating nationalism, or from the realization that symbols can spark
an emotional response in people.
The best example of this occurred earlier this month, when two officials from
the Chinese Consulate General in San Francisco attempted to intimidate David Lin
(林銘新), a Taiwan-born American who erected a large mural depicting Chinese
repression of Tibetans and Taiwanese, by writing letters to and then visiting
the mayor of the town Lin lives in: Corvallis, Oregon.
Surely, as representatives to the US, Vice Consul Zhang Hao (張浩) and Deputy
Consul-General Song Ruan (宋如安) should have known a thing or two about the First
Amendment of the US Constitution, which among other provisions guarantees
freedom of expression. Maybe poor training at China’s diplomacy school failed to
inform them of this, though this would not explain why their political masters
back in Beijing, whose permission they must have sought before launching their
tirade, would agree to such a course of action.
Perhaps they thought they could get away with it, as governments sometimes do
allow themselves to be bullied by China, and the Oregon town needs China more
than China needs it. However, Corvallis Mayor Julie Manning defended the
Constitution and appropriately lectured the two messengers on the virtues of the
First Amendment, which enshrines rights and responsibilities.
Here again is a case of Chinese officials undermining their reputation and that
of their country by attacking art and trying to impose the censorship regime
that stifles freedom of expression in China (but does not censor jingoists like
Sina Weibo microblogger @sunshineGaoyang, the purported editor-in-chief of the
Cross-Strait Economic Cooperation Weekly and self-styled “Taiwan expert,” from
rejoicing at the “wonderful” news of the assassination of the US ambassador to
Libya, or the Beijing Evening News’ calls for Japan to be “nuked”).
Whatever the cause, this trait among Chinese officials is a weakness that
Taiwan’s supporters should exploit. Taiwanese have an uncanny ability to
translate ideas through visual art and proliferate them via the Internet. If
artistic expression forces Beijing to reveal its true colors, then more art,
murals, films, banners and flags should be put out there to tell not only
Taiwan’s story, but by its reaction, that of China as well.
Starting today through Sept. 22, a series of activities — outreach events,
photography shoots, a marathon, music concerts, roundtables and a rally — will
be held in New York to support Taiwan’s bid to join the UN. Go check it out
(www.un4tw.org), and keep an eye out for Chinese reactions.
|
