|
Hong Kong leading the
resistance
By Paul Lin 林保華
The recent demonstrations in Hong Kong against the introduction of national
“patriotism” classes and the Legislative Council elections held on Sept. 9, can
be compared with Taiwan’s present political predicament.
Hong Kong’s objections to the “patriotism” classes result from a clash of
universal values of freedom, democracy, human rights and the rule of law, which
were — in part — left behind by the British and the rule of individual
discretion and authoritarianism as introduced by the Chinese.
Meanwhile, democratic progress in Taiwan is currently being restricted by the
same brand of Chinese authoritarian government. Democracy under the rule of
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is increasingly a sham. The reality is a government
that has monopolized all five administrative branches. People go to the
ostensibly democratic polls blind to the serious internal problems that afflict
the nation and elections are regularly won by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)
because of their control of major assets, the judiciary and the media.
The transition of political power that occurred in 2000 was purely superficial
in nature. The mechanisms of state remained the same and old laws were left
untouched. Things are no more just than they were before. Outside observers
cannot see the failings of Taiwan’s democracy and the Taiwanese themselves are
angered by what it has morphed into: They do not dare seize the initiative and
push for real, meaningful reform.
In the past, Hong Kongers could not understand why the Democratic Progressive
Party (DPP) insisted on taking to the streets about every other issue. Often
they would look on in consternation as lawmakers came to blows in our
legislature. Now, more people in Hong Kong are out on the streets protesting
than there ever were in Taiwan. Back in 1997, voters in Hong Kong had little
time for Leung Kwok-hung’s (梁國雄) radicalism and he was lucky to get elected to
the Legislative Council in 2004. In this election, his popularity was such that
not only was his own seat assured, but he was also able to help some of his
fellow candidates rally votes in their constituencies.
Twenty years ago, the largest pro-democracy party in Hong Kong, the Democratic
Party, was advocating moderate rationalism, but it was frustrated in Sunday’s
election and their electoral support fell by 20 percent in the five direct
election constituencies. Over the last several years, young people in Hong Kong
have become increasingly politicized and radicalized. The reason for this is
that Hong Kong is becoming more like China every day and it is the younger
generation — whose futures this will affect most — who are to be the greatest
victims of this process.
Two years ago, the Democratic Party engaged in secretive meetings with Beijing
that resulted in compromises on political reform, resulting in the addition of
five additional seats in the legislature for geographic constituencies, with
representatives elected through universal suffrage and five super district
councilor seats also elected through universal suffrage. The party found it
difficult to answer critics who accused it of having sold out Hong Kong’s
democracy. It was also accused of having made excessive concessions to the Hong
Kong government on other public policy issues — especially those concerning the
immediate interests of the middle and lower classes as well as the territory’s
youth — and of concentrating too much on talks with the Chinese communists and
with the Hong Kong government. It was also accused of distancing itself from the
more radical elements of the pro-democracy movement. Seen to be shunning those
it should have been supporting, much of the youth vote has discarded the party.
Neither did the older generation of pan-democracy camp members — with their
Greater China mindset — want to have anything to do with the rise of the Hong
Kong City-State Autonomy Movement (HKAM) or of the increasingly influential
calls for localization, fearing that they would be tarred with the brush of Hong
Kong independence. This explains how it was that high school students were more
active in response to the national education issue and the fact that they seem
to be putting sovereignty over human rights.
Since Ma secured his second term in office, he has backtracked on a number of
issues and the public’s frustration with him has reached new levels. Members of
his circle have been involved in a string of screw-ups, corruption scandals and
highly irregular judicial manipulation and he has sided with China over the
Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台).
On the Diaoyutais, he has made Taiwan’s situation more precarious. One hopes
that politicians in the pan-green camp will do something about this, because if
they do not, their supporters will start to lose faith in them. When China
occupies Taiwan, the younger generation will complain that we did not do enough.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated by Paul Cooper
|
