EDITORIAL: Pension
reforms are only a first step
Finally bowing to the public outcry, Premier Sean Chen on Tuesday announced a
proposal to limit the recipients of the year-end bonuses for retired
public-sector employees to retirees or the families of deceased retirees who
receive a monthly pension of less than NT$20,000 and retirees who were killed,
injured or disabled in wars or on military exercises.
While it deserves a pat on the back for being responsive to public grievance
over the issue of extra allowances for government-sector pensioners, the
government under President Ma Ying-jeou (°¨^¤E) must not sit back in complacency
and think that it has done an adequate job of quelling public disquiet and
addressing social injustice. There remain many more instances of improper
spending that the government should deal with. For instance, the 18 percent
preferential interest rate on savings for military personnel, civil servants and
teachers; the cash prize for retired public-sector employees every Lunar New
Year holiday, Dragon Boat Festival and Mid-Autumn Festival and the practice that
retired government-sector pensioners can have their pension adjusted in line
with salary raises for serving civil servants, public-school teachers and
military personnel.
Since all these practices have no legal basis, but exist in accordance with
guidelines issued by the Cabinet, how are these extra payouts worthy of Ma¡¦s
pledge to pursue social justice that he made in his inaugural speech earlier
this year?
How can Ma claim that his government aims to ensure fairness and social justice
when one group in the country enjoys the privilege of an 18 percent preferential
interest rate on savings while everyone else receives a mere 1.5 percent, with
billions of taxpayers¡¦ dollars being spent by the government to finance such a
preferential interest rate?
Oblivious to the sense of unfairness and deprivation among the general public,
Minister of Civil Service Chang Che-shen (±iõµ`) added insult to injury by
recently suggesting that critics of the retirement bonus practices were ¡§green
with envy¡¨ and chiding the critics for ¡§vilifying civil servants¡¨ and creating a
divide between ordinary people and public servants.
While it is pathetic enough to note how distanced government officials could be
from the sense of unfairness felt among members of the general public, it is
even more despicable to note the sort of twisted attitude government officials
harbor by going as far as accusing those who object of being inspired by
jealousy and of creating a social divide.
In case Chang and those of a similar mind in the Ma government have not noticed,
it is the government¡¦s very own poor practices that are fueling public fury and
ruining the image of the nation¡¦s public servants in the eyes of the general
public.
Ma has pledged to leave a legacy in his second term. As far as ordinary
Taiwanese are concerned, now is his chance.
If Ma could truly undertake a series of reforms that squarely address the
various unfair practices that have taken place over the past four decades, then
he would not only leave a great mark on the nation¡¦s history of having
successfully addressed an issue of social injustice, but he would also help the
nation¡¦s struggling finances ¡Xbooked and unbooked debt so far total NT$4.9
trillion (US$160 billion).
Equally importantly, he would clear the name and restore the tarnished image of
the nation¡¦s public servants, which have been stained by the Chinese Nationalist
Party¡¦s (KMT) selfish manipulations, making them their solid supporters come
election time.
|