Court urged to reject
Want Want appeal
CONDITIONS CONTESTED: Experts said that the
stipulations put on the media giant¡¦s bid to buy cable TV services by the NCC
were key to safeguarding freedom of the press
By Chris Wang / Staff reporter
Academics yesterday urged the Taipei Administrative Court to reject the Want
Want China Times Group¡¦s appeal of the conditional approval of its acquisition
of cable television services, citing concerns about media concentration.
With three suspension clauses and 25 additional clauses, the National
Communications Commission (NCC) on July 25 conditionally approved the group¡¦s
NT$76 billion (US$2.61 billion) acquisition of cable TV services owned by China
Network Systems, a deal that many fear would create a media monopoly.
The Want Want China Times Group subsequently appealed the case, claiming the
clauses are illegal and demanding they be removed.
¡§We call for the administrative court to uphold the conditional approval and
urge the NCC to abide by its mission statement and review the deal on the
grounds of protection of the public interest,¡¨ Taiwan Democracy Watch (TDW)
president Hsu Wei-chun (®}°¶¸s), who was representing an alliance of TDW, the
Taiwan Law Society and the Taipei Society, told a press conference.
The controversial deal raises fears of media concentration that could jeopardize
freedom of speech, Hsu said, adding that it had taken Taiwan a long time to have
media outlets free from government interference that no one could accept the
emergence of interference from business conglomerates.
Chiu Wen-tsun (ªô¤åÁo), a professor representing the Taipei Society, expressed his
concern to NCC Chairman Howard Shyr (¥Û¥@»¨), whose comments in a report to the
legislature on Thursday suggested that the commission may approve the deal.
In the report, Shyr cited the Jasmine Revolution in North Africa, saying media
concentration would be a non-issue in the age of the Internet and underlined the
importance of media mergers for improving Taiwanese media¡¦s global
competitiveness amid digital convergence.
Those comments were ¡§ridiculously incorrect,¡¨ Chiu said, as North Africans had
to resort to social media to voice their opposition precisely because mainstream
media had been controlled by the government. He added that media outlets are
different from, for example, airline companies, in that ¡§larger is not always
better.¡¨
Academia Sinica assistant research professor Su Yen-tu (Ĭ«Û¹Ï) the main author of
the academics¡¦ statement, said the groups are concerned that the NCC, as the
defendant in the case, would not do its best to win the appeal, which was why
they had written their opinion on the case.
As a reminder to the court and the NCC, Su said deliberations on media mergers
should be about more than market share and should also take into account the
political and economic influences wielded on a media outlet.
|