|
DPP concerned over
‘hasty’ trade pact
SERVICE AGREEMENT: DPP lawmakers said the
government only stresses the positive aspects of such a trade pact with Beijing,
but has not provided studies to back it up
By Chris Wang / Staff reporter
From left to right, Democratic
Progressive Party (DPP) legislators Tuan Yi-kang, Pasuya Yao, Lee Chun-yi and
Chen Chi-mai hold a joint press conference at the Legislative Yuan yesterday,
drawing attention to the lack of progress being made on an impact assessment of
a proposed service trade agreement with China.
Photo: Wang Min-wei, Taipei Times
The government’s announcement that it will
soon sign a service trade agreement with China despite the lack of professional
assessments on the potential impact that such a pact would have on the nation’s
economy, various industries and employment is a cause for concern, Democratic
Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers said yesterday.
The government’s “hasty negotiations” with China for a service trade agreement —
a follow-up talk under the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) — is
likely to damage, rather than benefit, the nation’s service sector, DPP
Legislator Lee Chun-yi (李俊俋) told a press conference.
It took Beijing more than two years to sign a free-trade agreement (FTA) with
Singapore and fours years to ink one with New Zealand, but the ECFA negotiations
only took five months, Lee said, adding that Taiwan’s national interests might
be jeopardized by Ma’s haste to complete cross-strait trade pacts.
The press conference, co-hosted by Lee and other DPP legislators, Chen Chi-mai
(陳其邁), Tuan Yi-kang (段宜康) and Pasuya Yao (姚文智), was held after government
officials held a closed-door meeting with the legislature’s Internal
Administration Committee on the service trade agreement yesterday morning.
The closed-door briefing was listed as confidential and they could not disclose
confidential information, the lawmakers said, adding that the committee was also
given limited information about the negotiations, which the Ministry of Economic
Affairs said would soon be completed.
The lawmakers said that according to the ministry, Taiwan should come out of the
negotiations as a winner, as China has pledged the opening of 65 service sectors
against Taiwan’s 55, but the agriculture and manufacturing sectors are expected
to suffer “a certain degree of negative impact.”
“There is give-and-take in all negotiations, but what the officials said was all
good news. They did not mention potential impact and losses that we have to
take. And they gave no scientific data and numbers. We are extremely
disappointed,” Tuan said.
The lack of professional assessments could cost Taiwan dearly, Chen said, as the
service sector accounted for 73 percent of the nation’s GDP and 58 percent of
the private-sector work force.
Most of the items China agreed to open market access, including architectural
design, are things that they are strong in, which means what Beijing really
wants is to attract investment and personnel from Taiwan, Chen said.
Taiwan’s Straits Exchange Foundation and China’s Association for Relations
Across the Taiwan Straits have both expressed optimism recently that the service
trade agreement will be inked before the end of this year.
|
