EDITORIAL: New GDP
plan, same old mistakes
Last week, the Cabinet unveiled a package of 13 short-term stimulus measures to
ensure that the nation¡¦s GDP growth can reach the government¡¦s 3 percent target
for the year. The government plans to spend NT$3.24 billion (US$108.2 million)
to boost domestic consumption and investment, as the nation¡¦s export-reliant
economy faces challenging headwinds.
The 13 measures include revising the capital gains tax on securities
investments, easing restrictions on domestic insurers investing in
infrastructure projects, setting up a NT$1 billion angel fund to invest in
business start-ups, introducing a cash-for-clunker scheme for old taxis and
buses and offering NT$400 million in cash subsidies on energy-saving home
appliances.
Premier Jiang Yi-huah (¦¿©y¾ì) last week said that the plan would boost the
nation¡¦s GDP growth, but it is questionable how many percentage points the
five-year plan ¡X during which the state is to spend NT$648 million each year ¡X
would add. In comparison, South Korea¡¦s latest stimulus plan is far more
aggressive, with the South Korean parliament last month approving 17.3 trillion
won (US$15.4 billion) of stimulus spending.
It is not surprising that the public response to Taiwan¡¦s latest stimulus plan
has not been positive. Most people think there is little innovation in the plan,
with the proposed measures simply mirroring existing policies. Instead, the plan
appears to be a continuation of the NT$389.4 billion ¡§Economic Power-up Plan¡¨
that the government launched in September last year, which included mostly
short-term measures.
Economists, too, say the government¡¦s solutions for weak consumption have
nothing to do with creating jobs or raising wages, which are key to boosting
domestic consumption. Moreover, they believe the government is too focused on
kick-starting the economy in the short term and has lost its vision to transform
the nation¡¦s industrial structure in the long run.
For instance, the latest stimulus plan aims to continue a short-term subsidy
scheme to encourage consumers to purchase energy-saving electric appliances,
rather than pushing forward a more ambitious program to collaborate with the
solar power and electric car sectors to boost consumption of rooftop solar
panels or electric vehicles. The government needs to understand that one of the
key factors in promoting ¡§green¡¨ energy-related industries in Taiwan is the
provision of firm policy support. Without this, the goals of achieving a
low-carbon-emission society and transforming the nation¡¦s industrial structure
will remain ideas for the foreseeable future.
A global competitiveness ranking report issued by the Switzerland-based
International Institute for Management Development last week showed exactly why
Taiwan should be concerned about its development outlook. The report showed that
Taiwan¡¦s place among the world¡¦s 60 major economies plunged four places to the
11th spot this year, the lowest since 2009, with across-the-board declines in
all four sub-indices: economic performance, government efficiency, business
efficiency and infrastructure.
No matter how difficult times are, Taiwanese are able to face challenges with
their hard-working attitudes and unfaltering courage. However, they often get
frustrated with their situation if the government does nothing to fix problems
or indeed makes things worse. If the government maintains the same approach with
the nation¡¦s development and continues leaving investment uncertainties to the
private sector, while ineffectively executing stimulus measures, it is little
wonder the public has no confidence in its latest plan to revitalize the
economy.
|