| EDITORIAL: Ma 
regaining lost trust is paramount
 The single most important task for President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) to save his 
legacy, with three years to go in his term, would not be establishing 
representative offices across the Taiwan Strait, nor would it be reviving 
Taiwan’s economy.
 
 His most urgent goal has less to do with hard power, and more to do with soft 
power: to regain the people’s trust from five years ago, when he won the 
presidential election in a landslide victory, saying that Taiwan would be a 
better country under his leadership.
 
 The president could start with a very simple first step: stopping the scheduled 
demolition of four farmers’ houses at Dapu (大埔), Jhunan Township (竹南) in Miaoli 
County. Three years ago, Vice President Wu Den-yih (吳敦義), then premier, and 
Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺), then interior minister, responded to public outrage 
over the Miaoli County Government’s seizure of land in Dapu to make way for a 
science park. They promised to preserve the remaining four houses and to find 
land where the affected families could relocate their homes and farms. Miaoli 
County Commissioner Liu Cheng-hung (劉政鴻) also apologized to the farmers for 
ordering the demolition.
 
 Three years on, the government has withdrawn its promise and seems prepared to 
tear down those houses, saying it never pledged unconditional preservation, 
despite government meeting minutes clearly stating the pledge.
 
 The so-called Dapu incident is stereotypical of the Ma administration, which 
shamelessly tells people it does not need to fulfill its promises because 7.66 
million voters in 2008 and 6.89 million voters last year gave it an 
“unconditional” mandate.
 
 Yet Ma’s unfulfilled campaign pledges and the dire performance of his 
administration during the past five years show just how far these voters have 
been let down. The administration has failed to deliver on almost every one of 
its major commitments, including the “6-3-3” pledge and the promise of the TAIEX 
reaching 10,000 points. The Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement was 
intended to boost the economy, and similar claims have been made about the 
recent cross-strait trade pact.
 
 Then there are the policies that Ma’s administration have not even tried to 
dress up as part of the mandate given to it by 23 million people. Without 
consulting either the Taiwanese public or the legislature, this administration 
has unilaterally increased fuel and electricity prices and signed the 
cross-strait service trade pact. The worst abuse has been in recently echoing 
Beijing’s “one China” framework.
 
 It seems Ma no longer cares about his credibility. Perhaps he thinks Taiwanese 
do not understand his reform plan, policies and visions and he, as national 
leader, must keep walking down the path alone and determined. Yet, ironically, 
“credibility” was the first word that came out of Ma’s mouth when the 
legislature tried to alter the content of the service trade pact, saying that 
Taiwan’s international image would be damaged if the already signed pact were to 
be changed.
 
 If Ma wonders why people seem to be opposing everything his administration does, 
it is because Taiwanese do not trust the government anymore.
 
 And if Ma wonders why trust would be the most important asset he has to keep, he 
need not look far. From 2006, former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) 
administration dramatically lost its credibility after a series of corruption 
scandals rocked the nation. This contributed to the Democratic Progressive 
Party’s defeat in the presidential election, and its tarnished image still 
haunts the party today.
 
 Ma needs to understand that there are no “two types of trust” in the world. Yes, 
Taiwan ought to be a trustworthy partner in the international community, but 
first Ma must win back the lost trust of the Taiwanese public at home.
 
 He should take that first step today.
 |