|
Young voices for
Taiwan’s future
By J. Michael Cole 寇謐將
It has been going on for several months. And with the passage of time and
exposure to the elements, their skin color has been darkening, their bodies
becoming leaner and the battle wounds — a scratch here, a bruise there — have
been adding up.
Over the past year, hundreds, perhaps thousands of young Taiwanese, most
university students, though some still in high school, have mobilized against a
variety of issues. They have protested across Taiwan, organizing information
sessions and concerts, developing a slew of Web sites to monitor developments
and to provide documents, photographs and film clips.
With the exception of the anti-monopolization of Taiwan’s media industry and
protesting against China’s growing influence within the sector, all the causes
have been what we could describe as “local.” In Taipei’s Huaguang Community
(華光); in New Taipei City’s (新北市) Sinjhuang District (新莊) at the Losheng (Happy
Life) Sanatorium; and in Miaoli County’s Dapu Village (大埔) the young activists
have rallied to try to stop the destruction of homes and livelihoods.
They have fought against the construction of wind turbines close to homes in
Yuanli (苑裡), again in Miaoli County; a hotel resort on Aboriginal land on
Taitung County’s Shanyuan Beach (杉原); and a cement factory in Dongcing Village
(東清) on Lanyu (蘭嶼).
To do this, they have pulled all-nighters, compromised their studies and their
health in Taiwan’s intense climate, undergone surveillance and been taunted,
arrested and beaten up.
They did none of this for the sake of self-aggrandizement, as some critics have
proposed, but rather to draw attention to causes whose outcomes they believe are
key to their homeland’s identity.
Leaders have emerged in the process, doing so well that their efforts have been
attacked, for example by those incredulous at their ability to raise large sums
of money. Others have come forward as reluctant public figures, pulled from
obscurity, among a maelstrom of greater forces threatening to destroy lives in
the name of “progress.”
Through their efforts, acts of injustice that would likely have gone unnoticed
have intensified into issues that speak to the nation at large, attracting
local, and in some instances international, media attention.
They have brought out the very worst in individuals in positions of authority,
forcing them to show their true colors. Government officials have been exposed
as liars, corporate leaders as thugs, media moguls as unprincipled, legislators
as self-serving and county commissioners as crooks.
To understand the depth of their determination, one needs to be there, in their
midst, repelling PVC shields and muscle, seeing the tears and the rage on
muddied faces, as protesters and victims fight for what they believe in, or for
something as basic as the right to keep a roof over one’s head.
There are the lesser reported angles of the story: the police officer’s sympathy
for the protesters as a youth is taken into a police station (“if someone built
wind power units this close to my home, I’d be protesting, too”), the hired
muscle who calls it quits as he no longer wishes to fight “his own people,” the
cop crying as people sing old Taiwanese songs outside the Legislative Yuan,
another officer with tears running down her cheeks as an old farmer, her way of
life threatened, confronts a member of the Executive Yuan.
Beauty and ugliness have been witnessed throughout. Some Taiwanese have donated
money, rented tents, provided shelter, food and encouragement. Others —
including legislators from both sides of politics, who should know better
because three decades ago they (and their parents) were storming the barricades
— have libelously referred to the activists as “professional protesters,” or
accused them of undermining social stability.
Others have accused the youth of being naive, of being played by unseen
corporate forces, or of being mere pawns in the struggle between — in one case —
the nuclear and wind power industries. Yet as anyone who bothers to get to know
them will quickly realize, those same protesters — many graduates from the top
universities — have mastered their subjects to a tee, and often offer commentary
that goes well beyond the simplified accounts in the media or those given by
officials.
Then there are those who will give the young activists a patronizing pat on the
head, but urge them to grow up and tackle “real” issues that touch on Taiwan’s
relations with China.
However, there is shortsightedness in regarding “local” protests as if they are
somehow disconnected from the larger problems of cross-strait relations, for in
fact, the two are closely related. After all, how can we expect this government
to keep Taiwan’s best interests at heart in its negotiations with China when it
cannot play fairly with its own citizens?
How can Vice President Wu Den-yih (吳敦義), who many believe has presidential
aspirations for 2016, be a credible candidate when time and again he has proven
the reason for his unflattering nickname (hint: it rhymes with “friar”)?
Equally, how can people place their hopes in the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)
when it selects issues based on their value as a tool to make the Chinese
Nationalist Party (KMT) look bad ahead of important elections?
Or when one of its most esteemed legislators, who comes from a family with an
unassailable tradition of opposing injustice, browbeats other DPP legislators
into silence over a project that involves a form energy that she has espoused,
yet the implementation of the project has led to undeniable (and repeated)
violations of human rights?
How can people place their hopes in a party that itself acted inhumanely when in
power, sometimes on the very issues that engender protests today?
In fact, all these “local” issues are directly related to national ones. Keeping
officials honest, while ensuring that the rights of all inhabitants on this
island are respected — whether they are rich or poor, young or old — by those in
power are inherently about Taiwan’s relations with China. This is because they
speak to the nature, spirit and character of the government that rules over this
nation.
If officials in Taipei cannot ensure that Ms Zhang’s house in Dapu isn’t
bulldozed to make way for a road, despite promises by then-premier Wu in 2010
that such an outcome would be averted; if Mr Chiang cannot be treated fairly by
a city government that wants to build a wonderland for the super-wealthy on the
ashes of Huaguang, how can we possibly expect these officials to be fair when
they strike deals with the authoritarian vultures in Beijing?
If crooks and miscreants are allowed to retain positions of power in Taiwan,
they will remain crooks and miscreants in their dealings with China, except
quite possibly in amplified form.
The battle for Taiwan’s future, and for its democracy, starts here at home
through endeavors that will ensure that honest and qualified individuals, people
who have Taiwan’s interests at heart, are given the responsibilities of high
office.
This is what the young protesters are doing.
They are fully aware of what is at stake, both locally and nationally.
J. Michael Cole is a deputy news editor at the Taipei Times.
|
