|
Master plan needed
with protests
By J. Michael Cole ±FÁıN
The week of protests against the cross-strait service trade agreement concluded
last week with a ¡§siege¡¨ of the Legislative Yuan by the Youths Against Service
Trade Agreement with China movement. As young people climbed the fence and
clashed with police ¡X a common occurrence nowadays ¡X I could not help but think
that all that effort, commendable though it was, will amount to little if it is
not part of a larger strategy.
After years of being criticized for not caring about politics, it is absolutely
refreshing to see youth movements, often supported by artists and academics,
take action against injustice, evictions, demolitions, murders in the military
and government ineptitude.
The individuals who have joined these efforts, some of them issue-specific, but
most as part of a growing alliance of causes, are among the most extraordinary
people I¡¦ve known in my almost eight years in Taiwan. Far from being
troublemakers or anarchists, as some of their detractors might be tempted to
describe them, the majority of activists are aware, highly educated and are
increasingly willing to sacrifice their time, money and personal comfort for
causes that, in their view, are directly related to the fabric of their nation,
present and future.
One of the main factors behind their decision to take direct action is the
widening gap between the government ¡X a government of and for the rich ¡X and the
public. Simply put, President Ma Ying-jeou¡¦s (°¨^¤E) administration and the
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) machine that lies behind him have grown
increasingly disconnected from ordinary Taiwanese and downright voracious in
their treatment of the weaker segments of society, who have the misfortune of
standing in the way of the party¡¦s definition of ¡§modernity¡¨ and ¡§development.¡¨
Another factor behind the increase in protests is because Taiwan at present does
not have an opposition party that can hold the KMT in check. Sadly, the
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is once again a mess, constantly fighting
against itself, divisive and incapable of looking beyond the next election.
Consequently, the party has been unable to propose any policy that appeals to
today¡¦s youth, let alone ones that could encourage light-blues within the KMT to
work with them.
The Ma administration, therefore, does not have to worry about the costs of
disregarding public opinion. As long as it does just a little better than the
DPP, and by using its unequaled financial resources, it will almost certainly
prevail in future elections.
Faced with this situation, it is no surprise that a larger segment of the public
has become disillusioned with politics and cynical about politicians. They are
therefore taking matters into their own hands by organizing protests,
conferences, breakfasts, film showings and developing a truly fascinating
Internet platform for information sharing and event organization.
Such efforts will not, by themselves, change policy. They generate publicity, no
doubt, and they gnaw away at the image of the Ma administration. They also serve
as education tools so that Taiwanese can be better informed about the issues
over which they have mobilized.
However, these battles must be part of a campaign and, unless the plan is to
overthrow the government altogether, will ultimately need to translate into
votes ¡X enough votes so that policies which are detrimental to Taiwan are not
adopted.
This starts at the local level: with families, friends and with one¡¦s local
party representative. They need to be pressured non-stop, and then pressured
again so that the ramifications of disregarding public sentiment are drilled
into the local official¡¦s head, and the message is then passed upwards. In other
words, civil society must explore ways to translate its actions into political
memes. The message must be such that it keeps local officials up at night
wondering whether old practices will still be sufficient to keep them in power.
I don¡¦t pretend to have all the solutions to this challenge, but one thing that
Taiwanese can certainly do ¡X and must do ¡X is to learn from other polities that
have gone through similar processes. And for this kind of activity, there is no
better place than Hong Kong. Not only is the territory replete with warnings and
lessons for Taiwan, its civil society is highly activist and has developed
various ways of making itself heard over the years (remember that, unlike
Taiwan, Hong Kong was never a democracy, not even under the British).
Current movement leaders in Taiwan must look beyond their differences with
people in Hong Kong and join hands with them, as they are both confronted with
powers that are keen on keeping them in a state of subjugation. Taiwanese youth
should explore opportunities for exchange programs with their counterparts in
Hong Kong, perhaps with some assistance from the universities or NGOs to which
they are attached.
The time has come for idealistic Taiwanese to join forces with others. Protests
cannot occur in a vacuum; someone needs to provide a master plan.
J. Michael Cole is a deputy news editor at the Taipei Times.
|
