|
EDITORIAL:
Cross-strait relations enter new era
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) on Thursday said in his Double Ten National Day
speech that the cross-strait ties are not international relations. The latest
definition of the relationship indicates that his administration is moving
closer to political dialogue with China.
Last year, Ma defined the situation with China as “non-state-to-state relations”
in the wake of a meeting between his envoy, former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)
chairman Wu Poh-hsiung (吳伯雄) and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) at the
annual KMT-Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forum in China, during which Wu made
similar remarks.
Taiwan and China share a special relationship because the two sides do not
recognize each other’s sovereignty, but would not deny each other’s existence,
Ma said last year.
The Ma administration tried to play down the political significance of Ma’s
latest definition by arguing that it is essentially the same as earlier ones.
However, Ma’s latest attempt to get a handle on cross-strait relations during
Thursday’s festivities sent a clear message that he is removing the barriers to
political negotiations.
When Ma sent Mainland Affairs Council Minister Wang Yu-chi (王郁琦) to meet with
Taiwan Affairs Office Director Zhang Zhijun (張志軍) at the APEC forum last week,
during which the two referred to each other by their official titles,
cross-strait relations entered a new era.
The two sides of the Taiwan Strait have handled affairs through semi-government
agencies or through party-to-party communications since Ma took office in 2008.
With the Wang-Zhang meeting, the two nations took a big step forwards in mutual
recognition of each government’s authority. The “special relationship” is no
more.
By showing goodwill to the Ma administration, Beijing hopes to speed up the pace
of negotiations and resolve political differences.
In his meeting with former vice president Vincent Siew (蕭萬長) at the APEC
meeting, Xi stressed Beijing’s “one China” framework and the urgency of
resolving political division so it would not be “passed on from generation to
generation.”
Xi’s remarks underlined a lack of patience by Beijing over the so-called “1992
consensus,” which it sees as an insufficient foundation for political talks.
Ma chose to unveil his new cross-strait rhetoric on National Day because of
pressure from China. The phrase “cross-strait ties are not international
relations” abandoned vague wording and the “three noes” policy — no unification,
no independence and no use of force.
Despite his basement-level approval ratings, the president seems no longer
conservative and reserved about cross-strait relations. His definition of the
situation indicates a strategic transformation of his policies. This
transformation will shape Taiwan’s future.
Ma should fully explain his new definition to the public and seek public
consensus on this critical issue. Whatever definition the nation decides on, it
should be the result of public discussion and a democratic decision-making
process. The future of Taiwan and China’s relationship cannot be the will of one
president or one party.
The public has lost trust in Ma and the KMT during the so-called “September
political strife” over improper lobbying allegations and allegedly illegal
wiretapping. As serious as these are, they are mere shadows compared to the
threat of a redefined cross-strait relationship. Ma must respect Taiwanese, who
have developed a strong sense of identity, and refrain from making wayward moves
against their clearly expressed will.
|
