|
EDITORIAL: Ma wimps
out over defense zone
Does an air defense identification zone (ADIZ) involve sovereignty? According to
President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration, the answer is apparently not a
definite “yes.”
On May 29, 2010, in a statement released in response to Japan’s proposed plan to
expand its ADIZ westward, which would leave it overlapping parts of Taiwan’s
ADIZ, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said it found Japan’s decision
unacceptable, as it would affect Taiwan’s airspace and national sovereignty.
Fast-forward to Tuesday and the Ma government’s stance has changed noticeably.
In his first public comment on China’s East China Sea ADIZ that includes the
disputed Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台), which both Taiwan and Japan also claim
sovereignty over, Ma said Beijing’s move does not involve “airspace” or
“territorial sovereignty.”
In other words, in the eyes of the Ma government, an ADIZ was a matter of
national integrity and sovereignty three years ago, but not now.
This striking difference is not only absurd, but baffling for many, who wonder
whether it may be yet another example of the cowardly Ma government lacking the
backbone to stick up for the nation’s authority and dignity when it comes to
dealing with Beijing.
Furthermore, many cannot help but wonder what constitutes treason if a head of
state blatantly harbors double standards that appear tantamount to assisting
Beijing in violating Taiwan’s sovereignty.
In fact, as long ago as December 2007, then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁)
sounded a warning over China’s possible move to designate a new ADIZ. In remarks
with then-visiting US Representative Eni Faleomavaega, who at the time doubled
as the chairman of the House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on
Asia, the Pacific and the Global Environment, Chen specifically noted that “we
consider China’s plans an attempt to alter the status quo in the Taiwan Strait.
They will pose a great threat to peace and stability in the Strait and damage
the status quo. We hope the US and Japan will jointly tackle this serious
issue.”
Ma is fond of comparing himself with Chen and claims to have more international
vision than his predecessor. However, we need to look at how pathetically Ma has
failed in the defense of the nation’s sovereignty.
Following China’s declaration of its new ADIZ, Japan aligned itself with the US
in condemning the move and refusing to comply with Beijing’s rules for aircraft
flying through the zone. South Korea and Australia subsequently expressed their
grave concern over the matter, condemning China.
Taiwan, under Ma’s leadership, however, has been relatively quiet, and the
government has failed to assert the nation’s dignity.
Not a single word of condemnation nor protest was uttered by the Ma
administration, just quiet rhetoric expressing regret.
The high-profile welcome for China’s Association for Relations Across the Taiwan
Straits Chairman Chen Deming (陳德銘) has been in stark contrast. This no doubt
creates an impression within the international community that Taiwan is aligning
itself with Beijing rather than the democracies of Japan, South Korea and the
US.
Ma often claims that tensions across the Strait have been “dramatically reduced”
under his presidency, thereby “contributing to regional stability and
prosperity.”
However, if this so-called reduction in cross-strait tension is achieved purely
through failure on the part of the government to defend Taiwan’s dignity and
sovereignty, what good is this fraudulent cross-strait “peace”?
Despite Ma’s trumpeting of the Republic of China’s sovereignty in his speeches,
he has wimped out on the international stage.
|
