|
CNA, PTS labeled
‘China mouthpieces’
BAD NEWS: DPP lawmakers branded the state-run
news agencies as pro-Beijing after they joined their Chinese peers in calling
for cross-strait media offices to be established
By Chen Hui-ping, Tseng Wei-chen and Stacy Hsu / Staff reporters,
with staff writer
The state-run Central News Agency (CNA) and the Public Television Service (PTS)
have come under fire for what opposition lawmakers say is their degeneration
into Beijing mouthpieces after the agencies issued a joint call with Chinese
media for the establishment of reciprocal media offices on either side of the
Taiwan Strait.
The call was listed in a six-point proposal jointly issued by the
representatives of more than 70 Chinese and Taiwanese media outlets after they
attended a forum organized by China Central Television (CCTV) in Beijing on
Sunday last week.
Among the Taiwanese representatives attending the forum were CNA chairman Chen
Kuo-hsiang (陳國祥), PTS chairman Shao Yu-ming (邵玉銘) and Want Want China Times
Group (旺旺中時集團) president Tsai Shao-chung (蔡紹中).
The proposal also called for the inking of a cross-strait cultural cooperation
agreement; a concerted effort between Chinese and Taiwanese media to promote the
“Zhonghua culture” (中華文化); and the normalization and formalization of
cross-strait media exchanges.
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Chiu Chih-wei (邱志偉) said CNA
appears to have reduced itself to China’s mouthpiece.
“Is CNA Taiwan’s state news agency or China’s? The demands listed in the
proposal do not conform with the Mainland Affairs Council’s policies, yet the
news outlet still danced along with China anyway. I think the agency is confused
about its role,” Chiu said.
Chiu, who is the convener of the legislature’s Education and Culture Committee,
said that since CNA’s overseeing authority, the Ministry of Culture, had
ostensibly failed in its duty to supervise the outlet, he would demand that it
deliver a report to the committee soon.
The CNA and the PTS receive about NT$300 million and NT$900 million (US$9.9
million and US$29.9 million) in government funding each year respectively. There
are also plans to allocate an extra NT$130 million to the latter next year.
DPP Legislator Chen Chi-mai (陳其邁) said the proposal’s failure to make any
mention of press freedom proved that cross-strait media exchanges would only
subject local media to the negative impacts of China, rather than helping it
exert a positive influence on the latter.
DPP Legislator Lee Chun-yi (李俊俋) said it was absurd for Taiwanese media to try
to pressure the government into allowing the establishment of cross-strait media
offices when what they are supposed to be doing is urging China to refrain from
suppressing press freedom.
DPP Legislator Kuan Bi-ling (管碧玲) said that as agencies that enjoy government
resources, CNA and the PTS’ cross-strait stance should be in sync with
government policies.
“I am fine with these representatives attending forums and seminars [in China],
but issuing a proposal telling their government what to do is [out of line],”
Kuan said, adding that Minister of Culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) needed to state
her view on the matter.
Chen Kuo-hsiang said he did not acknowledge the “joint statement” issued by the
forum, since it was unilateral and had therefore not being properly discussed.
Shao said he attended the forum in his capacity as a media professional in a bid
to better understand the development of the sector on the other side of the
Strait.
The Mainland Affairs Council said CNA falls under the Ministry of Culture, but
remains an autonomous news outlet and “since the agency’s managers informed the
ministry of their plan to attend the Beijing forum in advance, the council will
respect [their behavior] as long as no laws are broken.”
|
