|
Lee Teng-hui’s democratic legacy
By Nat Bellocchi 白樂崎
Thursday, Jun 24, 2010, Page 8
It was this month 15 years ago that then-president Lee
Teng-hui (李登輝) visited his alma mater, Cornell University. In retrospect, the
visit turned out to be a key development in US-Taiwan relations. It would be
good to pause for a moment and reflect on the importance of that historic visit.
Lee had studied agricultural economics at Iowa State University in the 1950s,
and — after an academic career and work with the Joint Commission on Rural
Reconstruction — returned to the US and received his PhD at Cornell in 1968.
During this time, he was deeply influenced by developments in the US, observing
the functioning of democracy up close.
After returning to Taiwan, he began to rise through the ranks, becoming Taipei
mayor in 1978 and governor of Taiwan Province three years later. A skilled
technocrat, he came to the attention of then-president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國),
who eventually made him vice president.
When Chiang passed away in early 1988, Lee was thrust into the limelight,
becoming the first Taiwan-born president. In that position, he made the final
push toward Taiwan’s momentous transition to democracy, ending the Temporary
Provisions Effective During the Period of Communist Rebellion (動員戡亂時期臨時條款) in
1991, moving toward full elections for all seats in the Legislative Yuan in 1992
and bringing about Taiwan’s first-ever direct elections for president in 1996.
However, internal democracy in Taiwan was only his first objective. He also
wanted to bring about an end to Taiwan’s international isolation, which was
caused by the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) decades-long insistence that
they were the rightful rulers of all of China. A small step in that direction
would be a visit to his alma mater, Cornell University. Once he could visit his
university, other doors would be opened, or so his thinking went.
From 1992 on, he and his government worked hard — both openly and behind the
scenes — to bring a visit to fruition. Initially, this was nixed time and again
by the old crowd in the US State Department, who wanted to preserve the legacy
of Washington’s 1971 opening to China and had little feel for the democratic and
international aspirations of Taiwan and its president.
However, in May 1995, then-US president Bill Clinton had to succumb to pressure
from US Congress, which was much more in tune with Taiwan and its democracy. The
resulting visit was in a sense rather uneventful — Lee gave a subdued speech,
merely extolling Taiwan’s democratic achievements.
However, the leaders in Beijing saw it differently: They perceived Lee’s visit
as a challenge to their goals of reining in and eventually absorbing Taiwan.
They began the first missile crisis in the summer of 1995; to be followed in
March 1996 by more missile firings designed to intimidate Taiwan’s electorate
ahead of its first presidential elections. The Clinton administration responded
to the provocations by deploying two aircraft carrier battle groups.
In spite of the threats, Lee was elected Taiwan’s first directly elected
president, serving until 2000, when he was succeeded by the Democratic
Progressive Party’s (DPP) Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁).
Lee can thus be credited for completing the transition to democracy, started by
the democratic opposition in the 1980s, and for laying the foundation for the
peaceful transition of rule from the KMT to DPP in 2000.
While many international observers lauded the second change of political power
in 2008 as evidence that Taiwan has become a democracy, we need to remember that
Taiwan’s fledgling democracy is still young and relatively frail. Constant
vigilance is warranted and we need to voice concern when basic human rights,
justice and values of freedom and democracy are placed on a sliding slope.
China is continuing to threaten Taiwan’s existence as a free and democratic
nation. Using the carrot of an economic cooperation framework agreement and the
stick of its military might, Beijing will continue to try to influence political
decision-making in Taiwan in its favor.
At this critical juncture, we need to remember the long road to democracy
traveled and protect the legacy left by Taiwan’s democratic opposition and by a
statesman such as Lee.
Nat Bellocchi is a former chairman of the American Institute
in Taiwan and a special adviser to the Liberty Times Group. The views expressed
in this article are his own.
|
