Annette
Lu’s power for Taiwan on Aug 06, 2004 Braving
a storm to cross the new Strait Annette
Lu astonished many people with her stubborn suggestion that residents in
mountainous areas -- mostly Aborigines -- emigrate to Central America to allow
``overdeveloped'' land to recover. But these comments were part of a greater
agenda of Pacific Rim diplomacy which has received less publicity. Lu talked
with 'Taipei Times' staff reporters Lin Chieh-yu and Huang Tai-lin about the
Democratic Pacific Union, floating universities and using the Pacific to forge
``cross-strait'' relationships"
Taipei Times: How is the proposed Democratic Pacific Union (DPU) different
to other international organizations? Annette Lu: The UN was established
in 1945 and is an organization with a structure based on
government-to-government relations. It therefore has greater financial
resources, so the contributions required from its members are larger. It is
known that the UN has been in financial debt for some time now. On political
issues and the like, it has definite and specific capabilities and functions,
although there also exist issues of parity between small and big countries. It
has the Security Council which holds a veto power, and this violates principles
of fairness and equality. So personally I think a contradiction exists in terms of its mechanisms.
Having said that, all in all we do recognize the functions of the UN. As for the DPU, there are requirements to become a member. First of all, a
member must be a country on the Pacific Rim. So far we have not rushed to
include Europe and Africa, instead focusing primarily on countries situated
around or across the Pacific. This is a rather new way of looking at things, for
in the past the development of civilizations has mostly focused on terrestrial
development. So, here we are, using the ocean as our base of operations and that
is why the DPU is different. We don't have diplomatic relations with many countries, so before we can
win more diplomatic allies, we have to hold these events in the mode of a
non-governmental organization. That said, our intention at this time is to use the name of our country as
part of the DPU. And the DPU member nations would have three representatives:
one each from the governmental, academic and industrial sectors. Given the organization's vast scope, another important element is to
separate it into three districts. The East Pacific is the American region, the
West Pacific refers to the Asian region and the South Pacific includes New
Zealand and Australia. I believe that the DPU can be established within two
years. But give me 10 years. After that I believe it will be interesting to see
how the DPU will have turned out. projecting strength TT: What do you wish to achieve with President Chen Shui-bian in your
diplomatic work? Lu: The DPU is a mechanism which we hope to
operate not only as a diplomatic tool but also to project Taiwan's national
strength, authority and prestige. Our key diplomatic area is in Central America. Through the DPU we wish to
extend Taiwan's mode of development abroad. We will in the near future join hands with Central American nations on
numerous joint ventures. Among the projects that have been proposed are
international marketing in the fields of agriculture, forestry, aquaculture and
animal husbandry. We think it is feasible to join hands with our allies in these
fields -- all the way from production to marketing. As long as they provide land
and labor, we can provide technical assistance and personnel and train their
people. We should establish a government-to-government mechanism of cooperation to
safeguard and encourage our people who are interested in going abroad to take
part in this endeavor. There are two means -- investing capital or forming
contracts -- by which they can contribute their expertise in their specific
fields. For those who are interested in this project, they might even want to take
their whole family and emigrate. This will be a win-win policy in which we
invest together and take a share of the profits. In other words, we will
gradually introduce our economic strength to our allies. Many of our other traditional industries, such as steel, petroleum and
electricity, have been moving to China. There are actually several Central
American nations who want these industries to move there as well and provide
assistance in these fields. In fact, last night I had an opportunity to share these ideas with several
leaders of industry at a luncheon. They welcomed the proposals and were excited
about them. Over these last years, many businesses have moved to China. The industry
leaders expressed concern over this, and I noted that many were feeling
apprehensive if the situation were allowed to continue. So, I have tentative plans to lead a delegation of observers [to Central
America] at the beginning of next year. Through the DPU, we will also be able to share our ideas with countries
that don't have diplomatic ties with us. Student The Executive Yuan has noticed that there are very few international
students coming to Taiwan to study. It is with these concerns in mind that the
government has plans to allot an annual budget to encourage more foreign
students to come to Taiwan. Through the DPU mechanism, we will be able to take
the opportunity to encourage member nations to come to Taiwan and learn more
about us, as well as for us to learn from these DPU members -- many of them are
more developed than Taiwan. Another idea under discussion is the formation of a "Pacific
University of the Sea". Cruising on a ship, students can both study and and
take in new experiences and ideas as the ship stops at various DPU member
nations. Given the expense, which would be considerable, this would be a program
tailored more to individuals with social standing and economic independence.
With this program we would learn to treat all Pacific nations as one family. In the past, we sent missions and aid to other countries focusing on
technical areas. Now we wish to assemble missions that focus on a more cultural
perspective. Using methods such as pen-pal correspondence, humanitarian
assistance and the like, we wish to promote cultural exchange, understanding and
interest in Taiwan. Viewing Central America as our key diplomatic region, I wish to cultivate
and implement a "new cross-strait" relationship. We have had nearly
five decades or so to cultivate cross-strait relations [in the Taiwan Strait].
But what do we get in return? Military threats, diplomatic isolation and being
fleeced economically.
Pacific
union set to take shape, Lu says TAIWAN,
GO GO GO!: The vice president said the democratic union will be established over
the next two years. She also announced plans yesterday to `retransform Formosa'
Vice President Annette Lu said yesterday that she believes the Democratic
Pacific Union (DPU) could be firmly established in the region over the next two
years. "I believe that the DPU can ... gradually actualize its goals and the
projects it aims to launch as it slowly takes shape," Lu said in an
interview with the Taipei Times. "Give me 10 years. After that I believe it will be interesting to see
how the DPU will have turned out," Lu said. She yesterday elaborated on a number of ideas and goals of the alliance of
democratic Pacific nations, which she initiated. The second Democratic Pacific Assembly, organized by Lu, is slated to take
place in Taipei from next Friday through Sunday. The assembly was formed last year to facilitate communication among the
nation's allies in Central America and the Pacific region and between other
Pacific and East Asian countries, as well as promoting democracy, human rights
and freedom. Regional security, marine resources, industrial development, technology
exchange and promotion of democracy will be the main themes of this year's
assembly. Lu said during the interview that she is preparing to push for a public
campaign in late October to raise awareness of the country's circumstances in
the international arena. Lu has tentatively dubbed the movement "Retransform Formosa, Taiwan,
Go! Go! Go!" "Our comrades in the `Formosa Incident' had their historical mission
in the previous era," Lu said, referring to an incident on Dec. 10, 1979,
in which the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government imprisoned participants
in an anti-government rally organized by Formosa magazine. Lu was one of those who took part in demonstrations at the time. She was
arrested for her involvement and imprisoned on Green Island for 1,933 days. "Now we are faced with a new era in which there are new challenges,
and we therefore need to retransform Formosa with a new historical mission,
which includes internationalization, a world vision and advanced
technology," Lu said, adding that the idea had been approved by President
Chen Shui-bian. "Previously, it was stressed that `Taiwan belongs to Taiwanese.' In
this era, we want to transform it into `Taiwan is part of the world.'"
Reform
can boost Taiwan-US ties By
Nat Bellocchi The US has been firm in opposing China's position on arms sales, but it is
less clear on the constitutional issue. It gained agreement that Taiwan would
avoid matters of sovereignty in the process of constitutional change. But
Washington did not voice opposition to changes that are legitimate reforms of
national governance. Beijing, on the other hand, opposes any change. This effort to amend the Constitution is the first since the process for
doing so was altered. The law now requires the Legislative Yuan, whose previous
role in the process was minimal, to play a key part. It must debate and approve
each amendment with the support of at least 75 percent of its members. Then it
must call a special session of the dormant National Assembly to vote on the
proposed changes. Here too, there must be at least 75 percent acceptance. This is a nightmarish process which a referendum would have avoided. It
would have given the people, instead of politicians, a greater say in
constitutional change. But China issued threats, and the US was presumably
concerned that a referendum would empower more extreme pro-independence
elements, risking a reaction from Beijing. It's the usual scenario: China,
frightened by the possibility of people voting on sensitive issues, threatens
war. The US, wanting to prevent war despite its support for democracy, presses
Taiwan to compromise. President Chen Shui-bian has clearly enunciated the constitutional changes
the government wants to make in the present reform process. These include
reducing the size of the Legislative Yuan and altering its method of electing
members; changing the relationship between the president, premier and the
legislature; reducing the levels of government to three; giving the president
expanded veto power and abolishing the National Assembly. Human rights and
economic provisions will also be addressed. All of these issues will be debated publicly in open forums before being
discussed in the Legislative Yuan. Doubtless there would also be open forums
initiated by nongovernmental organizations and other interest groups that will
lobby for other changes opposed by government. This kind of public debate will
doubtless take place well into next year. At some point, possibly in 2006, the
government will presumably introduce bills related to the Constitution to the
Legislative Yuan. Whatever the outcome of this December's legislative elections, the debate
in the legislature is likely to be strenuous and progress far less quickly than
the government would like. The pace of the process will be influenced by the
profile of the political parties and by the need for a 75 percent majority. Even under the most optimistic scenario for the pan-green camp, 75 percent
approval on any change is unlikely. Differences within the governing coalition
might split votes and hinder getting that percentage. In the best of
circumstances, therefore, amending the many constitutional problems will require
considerable compromise. And after all the debates and compromises have led to
the passage of bills, an ad hoc National Assembly will then have to debate and
pass the amendments approved by the legislature. There, votes along party lines
are inevitable and could present still more difficulties. Regardless of the extent to which the original objectives for
constitutional reform are met, the process will be an important step forward for
Taiwan's democratization. However, the process described above is based only on
domestic considerations, and does not take into account external pressures and
concerns. China is not likely to want even modest results in constitutional reform.
They will see this not as a move to better democracy -- which in any event they
oppose -- but as a move toward independence. China does not wish to accept that
Taiwan today is not the Taiwan of the days when its unwavering policy on the
cross-strait situation was formulated. Due to developments on both sides of the
Strait, insistence on a past idea of unification such as "one country, two
systems" is no longer sustainable. Reaching out to the US, as Beijing is now doing, to support a policy that
is not realistic is as much an admission of failure as it is a threat. While the
US has many divergent interests to consider, on cross-strait relations it
pursues a policy of opposing any unilateral change of the status quo. At the
same time, it supports Taiwanese democracy. All three countries -- the US, China and Taiwan -- support a policy of
peace, but only the US and Taiwan support democracy. There will be a growing
challenge to change that. For Taiwan, there is much work to do externally as
well as domestically. One priority should be to maintain transparency in the constitutional
reform process and reach a consensus on that process which is acceptable to the
public. That in itself would send a message to the world that Taiwan's
democratic system is based on the will of its people. And as pressure from China
grows, that message will be especially helpful to the strength of the US-Taiwan
relationship. Nat
Bellocchi is the former chairman of the American Institute in Taiwan and is a
special advisor to the Liberty Times. The views expressed in this article are
his own.
|