US freezes
weapons sales to Taiwan
'UNDER CONTROL': : Despite the unprecedented move, a KMT legislator with influence in defense matters was confident that the arms would eventually be sold to Taiwan
By Martin Williams and Jimmy Chuang
STAFF REPORTERS
Wednesday, Jun 11, 2008, Page 1
The US has frozen arms sales to Taiwan until the end of the Beijing Olympics and
possibly until US President George W. Bush leaves office, the latest edition of
Defense News said.
The periodical reported on Monday that the US State Department had elected to
freeze all congressional notifications — an essential process prior to approval
— for weapons sales to Taiwan.
The sales would amount to some US$12 billion for the acquisition of 30 Apache
Longbow attack helicopters, 60 Black Hawk helicopters, eight diesel electric
submarines, four PAC-3 air defense missile batteries and 66 F-16 fighter
aircraft.
Twelve Orion maritime patrol aircraft were not subject to the freeze because
they had already been approved for delivery, the periodical said.
Sources told Defense News that the unprecedented move came at the behest of
Beijing-friendly officials at the US State Department and officials at the US
embassy in Beijing, who believe that Washington should “placate China.” The
purpose was to smooth the way for talks between China and Taiwan and for Bush to
attend the opening ceremony of the Beijing Games, they said.
The periodical quoted Mark Stokes, executive director of the Project 2049
Institute think tank and former country director for China and Taiwan in the
Office of the Secretary of Defense, as saying the freeze contravened the Taiwan
Relations Act, a piece of legislation supporting Taiwan’s security that came
into effect when Washington recognized Beijing 30 years ago.
The Defense News sources disagreed on when the freeze would be lifted, but there
were reported to be fears in Taiwanese circles that the move could become
permanent after the inauguration of the new US president amid warming ties
between Taiwan’s Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government and Beijing.
Yesterday, the Ministry of National Defense told the Taipei Times that
“everything is under control.”
“I have no comment on the story, but I can assure you that our regular
communication and cooperation with the US remain intact,” ministry spokeswoman
Colonel Lisa Chi (池玉蘭) said.
But a Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) spokesman expressed concerns over the
report.
“If that happens, then I think the KMT should take all responsibility,” DPP
legislative caucus whip William Lai (賴清德) said.
Lai said that all the weapons on the list were items that the previous DPP
government had sought to purchase from the US for a long time.
He said much of the procurement process had been delayed because of the KMT’s
boycott in the legislature’s National Defense Committee, now known as the
Diplomacy and National Defense Committee.
“Ever since Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) entered the Presidential Office, the KMT has been
pushing the country in China’s favor. It does not surprise me that the US has
come up with this decision at this time,” Lai said.
Diplomacy and National Defense Committee member and KMT Legislator Lin Yu-fang
(林郁方) said he was not concerned by the development.
He said any freeze would bring a degree of relief to cross-strait ties and that
the US wanted to see a harmonious relationship develop between China and Taiwan.
Lin, however, said he believed the US would sell the weapons to Taiwan in the
end anyway.
KMT legislative caucus whip Lin Yi-shih (林益世) had no comment on the matter when
approached by the Taipei Times.
Taichung
mayor says Jackie Chan welcome to visit
STAFF WRITER, WITH CNA
Wednesday, Jun 11, 2008, Page 1
Taichung Mayor Jason Hu (胡志強) said yesterday that Hong Kong movie star Jackie
Chan (成龍) would be more than welcome to visit Taichung for a film festival a day
after city councilors said the star should be barred from attending.
“Politics and entertainment should not be mixed,” Hu said.
Hu’s comments came after Chan became the focus of a rowdy debate on Monday when
a joint committee of the Taichung City Council reviewed an addition to the
budget for the Golden Horse film festival.
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) councilors Hsiao Chieh (蕭杰), Chen Fu-wen
(陳福文) and Wang Yue-bin (王岳彬) and the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) Ting
Cheng-chia (丁振嘉) asked that the city not invite the star to the 45th Golden
Horse Festival and award ceremony.
“Jackie Chan still owes Taiwanese an apology,” Hsiao said, referring to the
actor-director’s description of the shooting of former president Chen Shui-bian
(陳水扁) on the eve of the 2004 presidential election as “a big joke,” which Hsiao
said was tantamount to “humiliating all Taiwanese people.”
“If Jackie Chan comes, I will pelt him with eggs,” Hsiao said.
In response, director of the Taichung City Government’s Department of
Information Chen Yun-feng (陳永豐) said the Chan incident was “a thing of the past”
and urged city councilors to look ahead, adding that directors from Hong Kong,
Macau and China would be invited to attend the gala.
As Taiwan is expecting the arrival of more Chinese tourists next month, he said
the film festival would also help promote the city.
The city has obtained the right to host this year’s Golden Horse Awards, which
will be held on Dec. 6.
The festival’s executive committee estimated that hosting the event would cost
about NT$60 million (US$2 million), with NT$15 million coming from the
Government Information Office, NT$20 million from the city government and the
balance from the executive committee.
Other councilors said the Taichung City Government should not spend money on the
project, but rather should ask for more subsidies from the central government or
solicit funds from private sponsors.
Several councilors said that as Taichung hosted the festival four years ago, it
should let another city or county sponsor the event because it would not do much
to promote Taichung.
The joint committee passed a resolution asking the city to request more funding
from the central government.
It said that if the city managed to obtain more funding, the additional NT$20
million budget would not be needed. Conversely, if no new funding was
forthcoming, the NT$20 million budget would then be passed.
In an addendum to the resolution, some council members asked that the Golden
Horse Awards executive committee not invite Chan to the festival, but a majority
of members present said they disagreed with the proposal.
SEF chief
to invite ARATS head to Taiwan for a visit
By Jenny W. Hsu
STAFF REPORTER
Wednesday, Jun 11, 2008, Page 3
Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) Chairman Chiang Pin-kung (江丙坤) yesterday
lauded the previous Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government for paving the
way on making the resumption of cross-strait negotiations possible and said he
plans to personally invite his counterpart, the head of China's Association on
Relations across the Taiwan Strait (ARATS), Chen Yunlin (陳雲林), to visit Taiwan.
The SEF and ARATS are the only quasi-official organizations authorized by Taipei
and Beijing to represent the respective governments in cross-strait talks.
Chiang, speaking to the press on the eve of the four-day Beijing trip, said the
DPP government had made significant contributions in reviving the mechanism for
official cross-strait talks, which had been frozen since 1999.
Even after the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) won the presidential election on
March 22, Chiang said, “many DPP teams continued to work hard to negotiate with
the other side.”
Chiang will lead a 19-member delegation comprised of officials from the Mainland
Affairs Council, the Ministry of Transportation and Communications, the National
Immigration Agency and the Tourism Bureau to Beijing today to close a deal on
commencing direct weekend charter flights for passengers and allowing Chinese
tourists to come to Taiwan starting next month.
The delegation will arrive in Beijing at 3pm this afternoon and the Chiang-Chen
meeting is scheduled to take place tomorrow morning before the official
negotiations start.
“I will invite Chen to come visit Taiwan at a time of his convenience,” Chiang
said.
Chen would be the first ARATS chairman to visit Taiwan if he accepted Chiang’s
invitation.
The negotiation process will be co-led by the SEF Secretary-General Kao
Koong-lian (高孔廉) and his Chinese equivalent from ARATS. Chiang and Chen will not
directly participate in the talks and will not meet again until the signing of
the deal on Friday morning.
As of press time, neither ARATS nor the SEF had released any names or position
titles of the Chinese delegation.
The first phase of negotiations will focus on direct passenger flights followed
by tourism in the afternoon. Kao revealed that Taiwan would allow Chinese
airline companies to set up branches in Taiwan because many Taiwanese airliners
have already done so in China.
Chiang said that although the two sides will not sign a deal on direct cargo
transport during this round of negotiations, the topic would be thoroughly
debated.
So far the SEF has been unwilling to confirm a possible meeting between Chiang
and Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤), however, a high-ranking SEF official has
told the press that “the highlight of the trip will not take place until after
the signing,” hinting that Chiang and Hu would most likely meet on Friday
afternoon.
Gates vows
commitment to Asia
By Ralph Cossa
Wednesday, Jun 11, 2008, Page 8
‘Missile defense, Ma [Xiaotian] said, was “not helpful in strategic balance,”
although he failed to explain why the massive build-up of offensive missiles
opposite Taiwan was any less helpful.’
The US is a “resident” power in Asia that has been and will remain fully engaged
in the region, supportive of and involved in the development of any regional
security architecture: This was the central message delivered by US Secretary of
Defense Robert Gates at the annual Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore over the
weekend.
Press coverage has focused on his “subtle warnings” to China and blunt comments
about Myanmar, but the real message was one of reassurance of continued US
commitment to the region.
This was demonstrated by Gates’ three main points: The US is “a Pacific nation
with an enduring role in Asia”; it stands “for openness, against exclusivity”;
and the future policy of any new US administration will be “grounded in the fact
that the United States remains a nation with strong and enduring interests in
the region.”
As one would expect, Gates pointed to Washington’s five alliances — with
Australia, Japan, South Korea, the Philippines and Thailand — as “the foundation
of our security presence,” adding that they were “enabled and strengthened by
our relationships with partners and friends.”
He said the US military presence in the region as a sign of continued commitment
and the ability “to respond quickly to a number of contingencies.”
Unlike the speeches of his predecessor, Gates barely mentioned China by name
during his presentation and when he did, it was generally in complimentary or
sympathetic terms. He praised Beijing’s “valued cooperation” on North Korean
denuclearization and noted the increased level of engagement between the two
militaries, while extending condolences over the tragic loss of life during the
Sichuan earthquake.
More obliquely — but with China clearly in mind — he acknowledged regional
worries about rising demand for resources and “coercive diplomacy” and called
for “more military openness in military modernization in Asia.”
When he cited the advanced notification and open manner in which the US shot
down a defunct satellite in February as an example of US military transparency,
the comparison with China’s anti-satellite test last year was obvious, even if
left unsaid.
Lieutenant General Ma Xiaotian (馬嘯天), deputy chief of staff of the People’s
Liberation Army (PLA), was less subtle. He did not mention the US (other than
including Hurricane Katrina in the list of recent natural disasters), but did
identify “expansion of military alliance” and “development and expansion of
missile defense system” among the major security challenges the region still
faces.
While Gates saw alliances as a positive factor, Ma saw them as “ensuring
security of some countries at the expense of others.” Questions from the floor
asking for clarification on this point were left unanswered. Missile defense, Ma
said, was “not helpful in strategic balance,” although he failed to explain why
the massive build-up of offensive missiles opposite Taiwan was any less helpful.
Nonetheless, Ma’s central message was also one of reassurance: “China is a
peace-loving country” that would always adopt “a defensive defense policy,”
would not engage in an arms race, would never seek hegemony or expansion, and
would be a “military threat to no other country.”
He also spoke of “positive developments” and “good momentum” in the cross-strait
situation, but added that “the mission of opposing and curbing secessionist
activities remains strenuous.”
Ma shared the podium with Japanese Defense Minister Ishiba Shigeru who, along
with Ma, underscored improvement in Sino-Japanese relations. Ishiba called on
Beijing to increase its military transparency but said that “Japan does not
subscribe to purposely overstating China as a threat.”
The toughest questions from the floor were directed toward — and largely
unanswered or evaded by — Myanmar’s Deputy Minister of Defense Mgen Aye Myint,
who wanted the audience to believe that Typhoon Nargis rescue and recovery
operations were proceeding smoothly, while assuring his colleagues that all
outside aid was welcome “as long as there were no strings attached.”
It was refreshing to hear an ASEAN senior statesman press his Burmese colleague
on the issue of “responsibility to protect,” even if there was no
follow-through. The genuine sense of embarrassment in ASEAN over Myanmar’s
actions in the wake of the natural disaster was obvious. But whether this takes
the form of policy-related actions or decisions remains to be seen.
The one thing that virtually all present, including Gates, seemed to agree on
was that there would be no forced distribution of aid.
The toughest response to a question came from Gates. In his prepared remarks, he
had been factual and largely neutral in discussing Myanmar, merely noting the
US’ willingness to help, despite obstructions, and welcoming ASEAN’s leadership
in searching for a mechanism to help get aid to those most in need.
When asked by a former Singaporean diplomat why Washington was not prepared to
change its “failed policy of isolationism” against Myanmar, however, Gates
forcefully said: “We have reached out; they have kept their hands in their
pockets,” adding that to date ASEAN’s engagement policy likewise seems to have
had “zero influence” on Myanmar. The problem here is not Washington’s — or
ASEAN’s — policies; it’s the ruling junta in Myanmar.
Unlike speeches by his predecessors at earlier Shangri-La Dialogues, Gates
mostly avoided talking about the Middle East or global issues in general, other
than to acknowledge regional concerns that actions in Iraq and Afghanistan were
distracting US attention from Asia, a notion he hoped his speech would serve to
disabuse. Refreshingly, nowhere in Gates’ speech was there any reference to the
global war on terrorism, indicating that the Pentagon has gotten the message
that Washington’s constant hectoring on this topic is counterproductive and
sends the wrong message about US priorities in Asia.
What defense establishments in Asia wanted and needed to hear was the
reassurance that, despite commitments and distractions elsewhere, Washington
remained aware of the region’s growing importance and would remain engaged,
regardless of who the next US president might be.
Ralph Cossa is president of the Pacific
Forum CSIS, a Honolulu-based nonprofit research institute affiliated with the
Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington.
There’s not
much good in Beijing’s ‘goodwill’
By Chiang Huang-chih
姜皇池
Wednesday, Jun 11, 2008, Page 8
Various Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) VIPs, including former chairman Lien
Chan (連戰) and Chairman Wu Poh-hsiung (吳伯雄), have visited Beijing in attempts to
improve cross-strait relations. After returning to Taiwan, Wu humbly declared
that he was well-treated by the Chinese before dispatching Straits Exchange
Foundation (SEF) Chairman Chiang Pin-kung (江丙坤) to negotiate the details of
weekend chartered flights and Chinese tourism to Taiwan. But there were previous
statements that, once dialogue resumed, Taiwan’s participation in the WHO would
be the main priority for discussion.
One begins to wonder if there are matters of greater urgency, or if Taiwan’s WHO
membership is no longer considered a priority.
There is no need to relate the oppression that Taiwan has suffered in its
attempts to join the WHO. China’s formulation of the “Anti-Secession” Law in
March 2005 shocked Taiwan and drew international criticism. But in April of that
year, Lien led a group to visit China. In response, China exhibited “goodwill”
and in May signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the WHO, promising
that information would be passed on to Taiwan and that channels of communication
would remain open.
The MOU is built on the precondition that Taiwan is the territory of the
People’s Republic of China and must look to the Chinese government for decisions
in all matters. Although the government did not accept the memorandum, the WHO
secretariat implemented it — a fine example of how Beijing’s “goodwill”
operates.
The Department of Health says that between 2005 and last year the WHO held 1,000
technical conferences on infectious diseases. China only informed Taiwan’s
Centers for Disease Control of 40 of these events, and Taiwanese experts were
only permitted to attend nine. In the last year, the WHO sent 236 health-related
notices, only 16 of which were relayed to Taiwan. Of those, most were so delayed
that the message was received only after the diseases had been covered in the
international press.
Citing the MOU, Chinese representatives to the WHO claim that the medical and
health requirements of their “Taiwanese compatriots” are well cared for, that
“Taiwanese compatriots” are participating fully in WHO-related events and that
China will fully assist in fulfilling the needs of its “Taiwanese compatriots.”
At this year’s World Health Assembly meeting, members asked why Taiwan only
received information concerning shigella after a long delay. China calmly
replied that the enormity of its country and the size of its population
occasionally leads to delays, but that they would work to improve their ability
to inform. Their attitude is an immeasurable tragedy for Taiwan.
Following Wu’s recent efforts, China appears once again to be demonstrating
their “goodwill.” Yet whether the WHO is still a priority remains unknown. The
government may believe that this opportunity must not be missed, and that all
should be conducted according to the supreme will of China. But if participation
in the WHO must follow the conditions of the aforementioned MOU, then no matter
what amendments are made, the degree and nature of participation will remain
entirely dependent on Beijing.
The price of accepting this framework is placing Taiwan within the People’s
Republic of China. If Taiwan can only increase its participation based on this
type of “goodwill,” then in practice it is at the cost of our autonomy. Rather
than increasing Taiwan’s international space, this model brings further
constraint. The government should proceed cautiously lest it make dire errors in
its impatient pursuit of a diplomatic breakthrough.
Chiang Huang-chih is an associate
professor at National Taiwan University’s College of Law.