Envoy to
Japan tenders resignation
UNDER ATTACK: Koh Se-kai
refused to show up for a legislative interpellation after KMT lawmakers
questioned his loyalty, while activists traveled to the Diaoyutais
By Jenny W. Hsu And
Flora Wang
STAFF REPORTER
Tuesday, Jun 17, 2008, Page 1
|
People First Party Legislator
Huang Hsi-lin prepares to throw a plastic bottle at a Japanese patrol
boat to protest the Japanese coast guard using a megaphone and
electronic signs to warn off a Taiwanese flotilla sailing around the
Diaoyutais to assert Taiwan’s claim to sovereignty over the island chain
yesterday morning.
|
Representative to Japan Koh Se-kai (許世楷) submitted his
resignation yesterday after he was accused by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)
lawmakers of being a “traitor” for “siding with the Japanese.”
As of press time, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs had not accepted the
resignation and had instead lauded Koh’s contribution and hard work in
solidifying bilateral relations.
“A solider can be killed, but must not be insulted. I absolutely cannot accept
the accusations that have been leveled at me,” said the 74-year-old diplomat,
who is highly respected in Japan.
Koh refused to show up at the legislature yesterday afternoon as scheduled
“because they [pan-blue lawmakers] would only pepper me with insults instead of
letting me explain the details of the incident.”
Koh said he had planned to submit his resignation after the transfer of power on
May 20, but the ministry had been reluctant to accept it, especially in the wake
of the high-seas collision off the Diaoyutai (釣魚台) islands a week ago that led
to the sinking of a Taiwanese fishing boat.
The ministry recalled Koh in protest against the Japanese authorities’ claims
that the accident resulted from a bungled attempt by the Japanese patrol vessel
to chase the fishing boat away from Japan’s territorial waters and that the
Taiwanese vessel was partly to blame for the incident.
Koh said he had originally agreed to stay on until the incident blew over, but
said “the caustic affront by the pan-blue camp has prompted me to seek immediate
relief from my duty.”
In a press release, the ministry said Koh’s refusal to show up at the
legislature for an interpellation session was “very inappropriate” because he
was still the representative to Japan and has the responsibility to report to
the legislature even though he has submitted his resignation.
The ministry also said Koh’s request to leave his position by the end of next
month must be approved by the president because the post he occupies is that of
a presidentially appointed special envoy. The ministry said it would respect
Koh’s wishes by submitting his resignation to the Presidential Office.
Koh, a staunch supporter of Taiwanese independence, also said he would not
consider giving up his permanent residency in Japan because he plans to retire
soon.
He said holding residency in a foreign country does not violate any law.
Koh said he obtained Japanese residency more than three decades ago when he was
in political exile after the then-KMT government placed him on a blacklist.
“I couldn’t come back to Taiwan. When my Republic of China [ROC] passport
expired Japan offered me two choices — to become a naturalized citizen or a
permanent resident. I chose the latter,” he said.
Meanwhile, KMT caucus whip Lin Yi-shih (林益世) lashed out at Koh for not
announcing his resignation at the legislature, saying that he treated his
resignation as “child’s play.”
KMT Legislator Lu Hsueh-chang (呂學樟) said Koh’s insistence on retaining his
Japanese residency had prompted suspicions about his loyalty.
In related news, KMT Legislator Lin Yu-fang (林郁方) said the legislature’s
Diplomacy and National Defense Committee should still make an inspection trip of
the area around the Diaoyutais tomorrow. He said the nation needed to take a
hardline stance on the Diaoyutai issue before continuing negotiations with
Tokyo.
“This is exactly what [President] Ma [Ying-jeou (馬英九)] said by ‘keeping it
alive.’ We have to keep the issue in the spotlight. Tokyo will talk to us nicely
when it can’t handle it anymore,” Lin said.
But KMT caucus deputy secretary-general Wu Yu-sheng (吳育昇) said there was no need
for the committee members to take the trip and such an expedition could raise
tensions with Japan.
“We should decide our next step after careful consideration,” he said.
A group of activists, escorted by Coast Guard Administration (CGA) vessels,
sailed around the Diaoyutais yesterday morning to highlight Taiwan’s claim to
the islands.
CGA official Huang Han-sung (黃漢松) told a press conference that the coast guard
had dispatched four large patrol vessels and five patrol cutters to guard the
activists’ boat.
The 12 activists sailed from Shenao, Taipei County, at midnight on Sunday,
accompanied by about 30 reporters.
Huang said the boat sailed within 12 nautical miles (22km) of the Diaoyutais at
4:55am. When the boat was within six nautical miles of the islands at 5:25am,
two Japanese patrolboats started to block the vessel. One Japanese boat started
spraying water at the Taiwanese boat, while another created waves to halt the
boat’s progress, Huang said.
He said the Taiwanese boat and its coast guard escort continued to press forward
until 5:44am when the activists’ vessel was within 0.4 nautical miles of the
islands, as the Japanese ships used ropes to halt the boat.
Huang said the five CGA cutters accompanied the boat as it circled the
Diaoyutais before starting the trip back to Taiwan at 6:23am. He said the
expedition had been peaceful, but tense.
Deputy Coast Guard Administration Minister Cheng Chang-hsiung (鄭樟雄) said a coast
guard vessel tried to communicate with the Japanese Maritime Safety Agency
authorities to tell them that the Taiwanese convoy’s sail around the disputed
island group was aimed at “protecting the territorial waters of the Republic of
China,” but the Japanese did not respond.
In related news, Koh yesterday reiterated that he believed Tokyo has already
apologized for last week’s incident by expressing “regret” and that the Japanese
government hopes the incident will not damage bilateral relations.
Koh said he had met with several high-ranking Japanese officials following the
incident, including a former prime minister, all of whom expressed a desire to
minimize the incident to protect bilateral ties.
“The government must be rational in dealing with this issue. Of course the
Diaoyutais are part of our territory, but we must exhaust all diplomatic means
and calculate each step carefully before we even speak of war,” the envoy told a
press conference.
Koh said that in Japanese diplomatic custom the word “regret” carries the same
meaning as an “apology.” The headline of one Japanese newspaper, he said, even
used “admits its wrongdoing” to describe the Japanese attitude toward the
accident.
Japanese representative to Taipei Koichi Ito and a Japanese coast guard
official, on separate occasions over the last two days, have said the Japanese
government hopes the incident will not damage bilateral relations and that the
incident was “deeply regrettable.”
Ito said the Japanese patrol boat Koshiki did not ram the fishing boat, as the
boat’s captain has claimed.
Although the Japanese government has agreed to pay compensation, the boat’s
captain, Ho Hung-yi (何鴻義), has been charged with “negligence due to incurring
danger during official business.”
The incident, and what has been seen as Tokyo’s refusal to give a formal
apology, has sparked outrage in Taiwan.
This has included an online petition that calls for a boycott of all
Japanese-made goods.
Meanwhile, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) spokesman Cheng Wen-tsang (鄭文燦)
criticized the Ma administration yesterday over its handling of the dispute,
saying the government lacked maturity and consistency.
Cheng quoted DPP Chairwoman Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) as saying that the administration
was slow to respond to the situation and has been inconsistent in handling the
affair, which created the impression that it was immature in dealing with
foreign affairs and did not know how to run the country.
Cheng, however, praised Koh’s performance, saying the envoy has done a good job
negotiating with Tokyo.
The DPP was sorry to see the administration use this incident to humiliate him,
Cheng said. He said the DPP supported Koh’s decision to resign.
Smugglers
feared to have shared nuclear blueprints
PROLIFERATION?: Drawings
found on computers in 2006 detailed how to build a nuclear warhead small enough
to fit on ballistic missiles used by Pyongyang and Tehran
AP AND THE GUARDIAN, WASHINGTON AND LONDON
Tuesday, Jun 17, 2008, Page 6
An international smuggling ring may have shared blueprints for an advanced
nuclear weapon with Iran, North Korea and other rogue countries, the Washington
Post reported on Sunday.
The now-defunct ring led by Pakistani scientist Abdul Qadeer Khan is previously
known to have sold bomb-related parts to Libya, Iran and North Korea. A draft
report by former top UN arms inspector David Albright says the smugglers also
acquired designs for building a more sophisticated compact nuclear device that
could be fitted on a type of ballistic missile used by Iran and other developing
countries, the Post said.
He said the network might have supplied Tehran or Pyongyang with the more
advanced and much more useful bomb blueprints that have now surfaced.
“They both faced struggles in building a nuclear warhead small enough to fit
atop their ballistic missiles, and these designs were for a warhead that would
fit,” he said in the report. “These would have been ideal for two of Khan’s
other major customers, Iran and North Korea.”
The drawings were discovered in 2006 on computers owned by Swiss businessmen;
they were recently destroyed by the Swiss government under the supervision of
the UN nuclear watchdog agency to keep them out of terrorists’ hands.
But UN officials said they couldn’t rule out that the material already had been
shared.
“These advanced nuclear weapons designs may have long ago been sold off to some
of the most treacherous regimes in the world,” Albright wrote in the draft
report, which was expected to be published later this week, the Post reported.
“This was very proliferation-sensitive stuff,” a western diplomat said.
Swiss president Pascal Couchepin, announcing the destruction of the files last
month, said: “There were detailed construction plans for nuclear weapons, for
gas ultracentrifuges to enrich weapons-grade uranium as well as for guided
missile delivery systems.”
A spokesman for the Pakistani embassy in Washington, Nadeem Kiani, did not rebut
the report.
“The government of Pakistan has adequately investigated allegations of nuclear
proliferation by A.Q. Khan and shared the information with” the UN’s
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Kiani told the Post. “It considers
the A.Q. Khan affair to be over.”
Traveling with President George W. Bush in Europe, national security adviser
Stephen Hadley said he had not read accounts of the Albright report, “But
obviously we’re very concerned about the A.Q. Khan network, both in terms of
what they were doing by purveying enrichment technology and also the possibility
that there would be weapons-related technology associated with it.”
In Vienna, a senior diplomat said the IAEA had knowledge of the existence of a
sophisticated nuclear weapons design being peddled electronically by the
black-market ring as far back as 2005. The diplomat, who is familiar with the
investigations into the A.Q. Khan network, spoke on condition of anonymity
because he was not authorized to comment publicly on the issue.
IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei had made it public knowledge back then and had
expressed concern about who potentially had come in possession of the
information.
The diplomat referred a reporter to a transcript of a panel discussion on Nov.
7, 2005, where ElBaradei spoke of at least one weapons design being copied by
the Khan network onto a CD-ROM “that went somewhere that we haven’t seen” and
added, “That gives you an indication of ... how much the technology had [been]
disseminated.”
Listen to the voice
Twenty-five days of shame
By Eugene Liu
, ATLANTA, GEORGIA
Tuesday, Jun 17, 2008, Page 8
May 20 was a proud day for all Taiwanese. Another peaceful
democratic transition took place as Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) was inaugurated as
president. It’s been almost a month since that glorious day, but President Ma
has fallen short of public expectations.
Although there were breakthroughs in cross-strait dialogue — something Ma
promised and promoted during his campaign — the administration has lost focus on
important domestic issues and unnecessarily escalated a boating incident with
Japan.
In the 25 days since Ma took office, Taiwan’s economy has been threatened by
inflation and higher prices of oil and fertilizer. Prices rose overnight without
warning to adjust to global market conditions and to prevent hoarding.
In theory, the price adjustments make sense, but because oil and fertilizer
suppliers are state-owned and their prices controlled by the government, the
aftermath for consumers has been quite shocking. The ripple effect of rising
fuel prices caused significant drops in the TAIEX as investors reacted
negatively. Workers, farmers and investors must now deal with having thinner
wallets.
Since Ma entered the Presidential Office, children have been threatened by a
spreading disease that claimed the lives of seven infants and infected hundreds
more. There is no coordinated effort from the executive level to counter the
epidemic; so far it’s the local municipalities that have drawn up plans to fight
the disease. Schools are being shut down, playgrounds are closed and parents are
being advised by city and county governments not to take their children to
crowded areas.
The administration seems so set on approving a deal to bring over Chinese
tourists and arranging airplane services that it has neglected these young
sufferers and their distressed families.
It has been 25 days in a typical rainy season. Recent downpours have drowned
towns in the south and devastated crops. Along with the higher fertilizer price,
this has not been a good year to be a farmer in Taiwan. Premier Liu Chao-shiuan
(劉兆玄) visited the hardest-hit regions, but the president remained silent on the
matter when he was questioned by reporters during a trip to Tainan. Neither did
he extend his itinerary to visit nearby flooded regions. Where is the
compassionate politician that the public elected?
Ma has also faced his first international incident, which could soon escalate
into a crisis. A Taiwanese fishing boat conducting business off Diaoyutai
collided with a Japanese patrol vessel and sunk. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs
protested the incident, demanded an apology and recalled its representative to
Japan. Now there’s talk of sending the navy to Diaoyutai to face off with
Japanese patrol boats.
This saber-rattling merely reflects the immaturity of the administration. The
defense and foreign ministries should know that only the president has the
constitutional authority to deploy the military, and that sending battleships in
that direction would not be taken lightly and could even be construed as an act
of war.
Keeping in mind that there is no formal diplomatic relationship with Japan,
Tokyo actually saved Taiwan face by treating this as a legal dispute and not a
diplomatic one, but the foreign ministry, by recalling its envoy, transformed it
into a diplomatic matter.
To make matters worse, Ma again remained silent, never coming out to publicly
declare Taiwan’s sovereignty over the Diaoyutai islets nor offering a clear,
concise course of action.
What if Japan offers no apology? Are we to risk severing all ties with Japan,
one of the most important East Asian nations? What if China decides to send its
naval ships there, too? What position will we take then?
Judging by how the administration is handling these issues, the public would
likely give Ma and his Cabinet a failing grade in a first monthly review. That’s
really a shame, because voters had high hopes for — and were promised — positive
changes in Taiwan.
Diaoyutai
scrap needs diplomatic solutions
By Ng Chiau-Tong 黃昭堂
Tuesday, Jun 17, 2008, Page 8
The incident involving a Taiwanese fishing boat that sunk when it was hit by a
Japan Coast Guard patrol boat has drawn a lot of criticism in Taiwan and
according to reports, this matter has also attracted a lot of attention in
Japan.
Serious conflicts over territory are common even between friendly nations.
Taiwan and Japan have close relations that are constantly improving. Relations
between both sides are now at the highest point they have been in 50 years.
Hopefully the leaders of Taiwan and Japan will be able to solve this conflict in
a calm manner.
The best way of handling this matter is for both parties to make the truth of
the incident known and then come up with ways to make amends.
While this issue involved a fishing boat, the crux of the matter is territorial
sovereignty. If the Diaoyutais belong to Taiwan, then a Taiwanese boat fishing
within its own territory is legal.
On the other hand, if the Diaoyutais belong to Japan, the actions carried out by
the Japan Coast Guard were also legal. In the second case, it should still be
asked whether Japan’s actions were excessive.
The Diaoyutai archipelago is made up of uninhabited islands, and from early
times only fishermen from the Ryuku islands and Taiwan fished there. The area’s
small, narrow geography makes it unsuitable for habitation and therefore the
sovereignty of the area was never really an issue.
Later, according to the Treaty of Shimonoseki signed by Japan and the Qing court
of China, Taiwan was ceded to Japan. Fishermen from Taiwan and the Ryuku islands
continued to fish as they had done in the past with no conflict.
Japanese fishermen even erected racks for drying fish on the islets.
After World War II, when the US occupied the Ryukus, the US military used the
Diaoyutais as a shooting range until 1972, when it returned the Ryukyus to
Japan.
Ever since then the area has been effectively ruled by Japan.
Japan legally gave up its claim to Taiwan when the San Francisco Peace Treaty
came into effect in 1952. Since then, some have claimed that Taiwan is a
sovereign nation, while others claim that its status is uncertain.
But the Taiwanese public and government have never declared ownership of the
Diaoyutai in an international forum.
The Diaoyutais attracted much international attention when reports some years
ago suggested that there were oil reserves in the area.
That was the time when the Republic of China on Taiwan asserted its ownership
over the islets.
Meanwhile, because the People’s Republic of China believes that Taiwan is a part
of its territory, it views the islets as part of its own territory.
It is therefore evident that Beijing’s claims to the islets are hard to accept.
This incident has happened at a time when Taiwan-Japan relations are warming.
Hopefully, the Taiwanese and Japanese governments can negotiate peacefully and
rationally based on their friendship and resolve the matter appropriately while
maintaining their mutual interests.
From history and experience, we know that the negotiation of sovereign issues is
often time-consuming.
To maintain friendly relations in the long term, the Taiwanese and Japanese
governments should come up with a temporary solution so that they can share the
waters for fishing and marine resources.
Ng Chiau-tong is chairman of World
United Formosans for Independence.