¡@
Taiwan¡¦s economic suicide note
Friday, Jul 02, 2010, Page 8
Given the rate of growth in the China market, Taiwan needs to
be part of it if it wants its economy to grow. That at least is the government¡¦s
version of events and the main reason it has pushed to sign the Economic
Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA). President Ma Ying-jeou (°¨^¤E) has accused
the previous administration of allowing Taiwan to become marginalized, insisting
that Taiwan¡¦s economy needs China to survive.
However, the reality is that China needs Taiwan. Ma has got it the wrong way
around. He has allowed his ideological prejudices to get in the way of an
objective analysis of what is actually happening. He cannot make the right
decisions for Taiwan¡¦s economic development and he doesn¡¦t know how to play to
the country¡¦s strengths. He is dancing to China¡¦s tune.
That China¡¦s economy relies on Taiwan is an incontrovertible fact. So why is the
government hell bent on saying the total opposite? Because if it told it like it
is, the public would see straight away that the supposed economic benefits of
the ECFA are nothing but a smokescreen for the real agenda of eventual
unification with China. It has got absolutely nothing to do with establishing a
lifeline for an ailing economy.
According to a recent study by Tung Chen-yuan (µ£®¶·½) of the Graduate Institute of
Development Studies at National Chengchi University, at the end of 2008,
Taiwanese companies in China employed more than 14.5 million people or 1.87
percent of the total working population of China. That figure is more than all
of the people employed in Taiwan put together. Creation of jobs notwithstanding,
the Chinese government also received almost NT$4 trillion (US$1.2 billion) in
tax revenue from Taiwanese-invested firms from 1992 to 2007, 3.71 percent of the
total national tax receipts during the same period.
It is important to realize that China¡¦s economic growth is export-driven, and it
is a favorable location for companies all over the world to invest. From 1998 to
2008, Taiwanese businesses plowed more than US$166.5 billion in direct
investment into China, and the total value of exports from Taiwanese businesses
in China amounted to almost NT$2 trillion, or 13.87 percent of China¡¦s
international trade volume for the same period.
The above figures do not include indirect Taiwanese investment in China via
outlying territories such as Hong Kong, the British Virgin Islands or the Cayman
Islands, so they fall short of the actual numbers.
The fact that the figures are underestimating the true picture makes them all
the more astonishing. For a start, they completely undermine the present
administration¡¦s assertion that the previous government closed Taiwan off to
trade with China or that Taiwan did not engage enough economically with China in
the past. The reality is Taiwan¡¦s economic woes are due not to too little
investment in China, but rather too much, and especially during the period when
Taiwan¡¦s economy was in trouble.
We have been bleeding investment into China. Little wonder that the economy has
slowly but surely been going downhill. If we are to get Taiwan back on its feet
again we need to change tack and stop this over-reliance on China. We need to
look further afield and not bind ourselves to the China market. The ECFA is all
about creating a single joint market with China and increasing our reliance on
it. This is not the way forward.
The government has avoided any mention of the possible disadvantages of signing
the ECFA during this entire negotiation process: Its discussion has focused
entirely on the positive effects and it has done the same thing with the ¡§early
harvest¡¨ list, bamboozling the public with figures. ¡§Look,¡¨ the government says,
¡§we have 539 products with tariff concessions or exemptions, compared with only
267 allotted to China.¡¨ The apparent advantage here is just part of a gambit by
Beijing to entice Taiwan into agreeing to sign, and will ultimately evaporate
into thin air as WTO regulations do not allow trade barriers to exist between
member states. For example, they stipulate that customs duties on anything
between 85 percent and 95 percent of products are to be removed entirely, within
10 years.
Negotiators for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese Communist
Party, concerned about a public backlash, have been trying to cover up the
possible impact of the deal on Taiwan, and decided to hold meetings every six
months to review the small print. That means 20 meetings over the next 10 years.
If in the first instance it appears that some of Taiwan¡¦s more vulnerable
industries have not been exposed to unfair competition from Chinese providers,
this does not mean that they can necessarily assume they will be spared in the
long term. No Taiwanese industry is going to be protected forever.
Other dangers to look out for include the flooding of the market with cheap
Chinese goods adulterated with dubious ingredients of a non-specific origin.
Another is the deregulation of Chinese services allowed to operate in Taiwan,
opening the door to an influx of Chinese laborers that will take jobs from
Taiwanese and exert downward pressure on wages.
There is no way that Taiwanese services will be able to compete with this
onslaught and, since service industries account for 75 percent of the economy
and between 60 percent and 70 percent of jobs in Taiwan, this is going to be
disastrous for the economy, which will be uprooted and vulnerable to collapse.
The consequences of this do not bear thinking about. The ECFA is basically
economic suicide, and the government appears blind to this fact. It is important
that the public stand up and prevent the government from going through with the
agreement, Taiwan¡¦s very survival could be at stake.
¡@
|