Editorial: Beijing
will not cooperate on N Korea
Analysts and diplomats last week were hinting at a possible attitudinal shift in
Beijing on the North Korea issue after China, Pyongyang¡¦s longtime ally, voted
for UN Security Council Resolution 2094, which imposes additional sanctions on
North Korea to punish it for conducting its third nuclear test on Feb. 12.
However, despite signaling displeasure with Pyongyang¡¦s brinkmanship, Beijing
does not yet seem willing to do what is required to stop its neighbor from
flirting with weapons of Armageddon.
The signs on Thursday last week were promising: Beijing had signed on to the
latest round of sanctions, while some influential figures, such as retired
People¡¦s Liberation Army major general Luo Yuan (ù´©), a prominent foreign policy
hawk, were warning North Korea that although both nations had been ¡§comrade[s]
and brothers-in-arms in the past,¡¨ if Pyongyang harmed China¡¦s national
interests, ¡§we¡¦ll get even with you.¡¨
However, if the reports that emerged on Monday are any indication, the optimism
may have been a little premature. Beijing¡¦s apparent change of heart might be
nothing more than cosmetic.
After years of investigation, US and South Korean authorities have uncovered
what are said to be dozens of accounts at several banks in Shanghai and
elsewhere in China belonging to North Korean leader Kim Jong-un. The South
Korean government believes that the freezing of these slush funds, which
reportedly contain hundreds of millions of US dollars, could put a serious dent
in Pyongyang¡¦s efforts to develop weapons of mass destruction.
Unfortunately, Seoul¡¦s urgings that the China-based banks be included in the
latest round of sanctions against Pyongyang were reportedly ignored, a
shortcoming that puts the effectiveness of the sanctions regime into question.
Once again, despite universal condemnation of a regime that consistently defies
international law, threatens regional security and has reduced its population to
starvation, Beijing is failing to do what is necessary to put an end to the
problem. Its inaction ensures that North Korea will continue to destabilize the
region and threaten war in this increasingly important part of the world.
That is not to say that Pyongyang¡¦s intransigence has not forced some Chinese to
re-evaluate their assumptions about their neighbor. However, while some tactical
adjustments may be seen on China¡¦s part to deal with this growing malaise, the
likelihood that major policy changes will occur at the strategic level is very
slim.
Beijing wants to have it both ways: It wants to see North Korea abandon its
nuclear ambitions, but not at the cost of undermining the regime and
destabilizing the country.
This dual approach is at the heart of China¡¦s North Korea policy and ensures
that a resolution will remain nowhere in sight, a ¡§status quo¡¨ that serves the
additional purpose of keeping US and Japanese forces focused on Pyongyang,
rather than on its own military expansion and territorial ambitions.
As long as the North continues to be run by an unpredictable regime ¡X which the
young Kim, like his father, former North Korean leader Kim Jong-il, appears
prepared to do ¡X South Korean, Japanese and US forces will remain tied up in
North Korea and will be unable to allocate additional manpower to areas of less
immediate concern, such as the East and South China seas, as well as the Taiwan
Strait.
Therefore, it would be foolish to expect Beijing to fully cooperate with Japan
and the West on the North Korea issue. As long as tensions and instability on
the Korean Peninsula remain manageable and continue to serve Beijing¡¦s national
interests, Zhongnanhai will not be a partner we can count on to rein in the
crazies in Pyongyang.
|