The Liberty Times
Editorial: ‘Truce’ opens Taiwan up to attack
“Flexible diplomacy” and a “diplomatic truce” with China, two policies that
President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration has been following, have clearly
reached a dead end. On Thursday last week, the Gambia, one of Taiwan’s four
African diplomatic partners, announced that it was cutting diplomatic ties with
the Republic of China in what the official statement called its “strategic
national interest.” However, Gambian President Yahya Jammeh said that his
countrymen wished to “remain friends with the people of Taiwan.”
The most worrying thing about this incident is that nobody in the Ma
administration had any idea that Jammeh was going to cut ties. Even Taiwan’s
embassy in the Gambia was caught unawares.
The government is completely out of touch, and this latest incident cannot be
called anything but a dismal failure on its part. How many more of Taiwan’s
diplomatic partnerships are calm on the surface, but with treacherous currents
flowing below? The question is a worrying one.
Judging by its reaction the day after the Gambia’s announcement, the government
was completely caught off balance and is at a loss about what to do next. The
Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Taipei took the Gambian flag down and then put it
back up again. It was not until Monday that the government announced it was
cutting diplomatic ties with Banjul.
In his remarks on Friday, Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) said that although the
Gambia had unilaterally terminated relations with Taiwan, it had not announced
that it was establishing ties with the People’s Republic of China. Since there
had been no such sequence of events, Jiang judged that Banjul’s decision would
not set off a domino effect.
Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson Hong Lei (洪磊) said that China
had learned about the Gambia’s decision from foreign media and that it had not
had any contact with the country prior to the announcement. These remarks are
just beating around the bush.
Ma and Jiang do not want to admit that although the Gambia has not followed up
its termination of relations with Taiwan by establishing ties with China, it has
nevertheless cleared the way for Beijing to score a gain in its diplomatic war
During the more than five years that the government has been maintaining a
“diplomatic truce” with China, the nation has neither gained nor lost any
diplomatic partners. While this may seem to be an achievement, it is an illusory
one because it depends on Beijing “politely declining” any overtures from
Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, rather than reflecting firmer friendships between
Taipei and its partner countries.
A “truce” of this kind cannot be expected to hold up under pressure. If any of
the nation’s diplomatic partners, or China, wants to twist Ma’s arm, the
illusion of a truce can be broken straight away.
On this occasion the government rushed to declare that China did not have
anything to do with the incident. Ma’s anxiety that Taiwanese might
“misunderstand” Beijing’s motives is obvious. If any of Taipei’s diplomatic
partners insist on cutting relations with Taiwan even though they know that
China will “politely decline” any overtures they may make, does that not put
Taiwan in an even more embarrassing situation?
China has on several occasions expressed its impatience over the cross-strait
service trade agreement, which was signed in June, but has not been approved by
the legislature. Ma thought he could remove a stumbling block and get the
agreement approved more quickly by sidelining Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng
(王金平), but the mess he made of that sent his approval rate down to a new low of
9.2 percent and made Taiwanese even more suspicious about the pact.
No matter whether the Gambia broke off diplomatic relations of its own accord or
under external pressure, it will only increase the pressure on Ma, who already
needs Beijing’s help to get the service trade agreement approved as soon as
possible. It is quite possible that Jammeh acted on his own, hoping to gain
favor with China.
Given that Ma can hardly take any more blows to his ailing prestige, he may be
hoping that China will politely advise the Gambia to reconsider its move.
It remains to be seen whether the Gambia’s severance of diplomatic ties will set
off a domino effect.
Nonetheless, the incident proves that as long as Ma goes on talking about Taiwan
and China as being two areas of the same country, complying with China’s
policies, which are aimed at annexing Taiwan, and maintaining the so-called
“diplomatic truce,” Taipei’s other diplomatic partners could follow in the
Gambia’s footsteps at any time, in the interests of their respective “strategic
If China desists for the time being from luring Taiwan’s diplomatic allies away,
it is nothing for Ma to gloat about. It only means that Beijing is maintaining
an appearance of calm while getting up to its old tricks under the surface.
While making sure that Ma keeps his guard down and forgets who the main opponent
really is, China is working away at winning over the nation’s diplomatic allies.
When the moment arrives, it can scoop them up all in one go, and Taiwan’s status
as a nation will go up in smoke.
While Hong made it look as though the Gambia’s move had nothing to do with
China, one thing he said is worthy of special attention. After saying that there
had been no contact between China and the Gambia, Hong immediately added: “There
is only one China in the world. Adherence to the ‘one China’ principle is a
common understanding of the international community, and supporting peaceful
reunification between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait is the general trend of
The implication was that the Gambia’s severance of diplomatic ties with Taiwan
was an expression of a general global consensus, and that would be the ultimate
conclusion to draw from Ma’s claim that cross-strait relations are not
international relations. It could be that some of Taiwan’s 22 remaining
diplomatic partners will decide to follow Banjul’s example even if they do not
declare that they are establishing diplomatic ties with China.
That would make it easy for China to deny any responsibility, while
strengthening its hand to put pressure on Ma at the same time. That would be the
inevitable outcome of Ma’s “diplomatic truce,” and if that happens the “truce”
will end up as a “diplomatic heart attack” for Taiwan.
Translated by Julian Clegg