Listen to the voice
Rice's remarks on Taiwan-US relations
INTERNATIONAL SPACE: A
comment made by the US secretary of state conveyed a message that should set
alarms ringing in the Ma administration, the DPP said
By Ko Shu-ling
Tuesday, Jun 24, 2008, Page 3
“Ms. Rice was reminding the administration that the US is Taiwan’s leverage and buttress.”－Cheng Wen-tsang, DPP spokesman
Recent comments by US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice were aimed at reminding President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration that a close Taiwan-US relationship is indispensable in maintaining regional and cross-strait peace, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) said yesterday.
DPP Spokesman Cheng Wen-tsang (鄭文燦) said his party hoped the administration would hear the “alarm bells” message that Washington was sending and use it wisely when conducting cross-strait and foreign relations.
“Ms. Rice was reminding the administration that the US is Taiwan’s leverage and buttress,” he said. “A close relationship between Taiwan and the US is essential in protecting Taiwan’s status in the Asia-Pacific region and peace in the Taiwan Strait.”
Cheng made the comments while talking to reporters about comments Rice made in an interview with the Wall Street Journal last Thursday.
Rice said that although the US encourages improvements in the Taiwan-China relationship, she wanted to remind people that the US has a strong relationship with Taiwan and would like to see “Taiwan have real space in the international community.”
Rice was responding to a question on whether the election of Ma had opened an opportunity to improve US-Taiwan relations.
Cheng yesterday said that Ma had been leaning toward China since his inauguration on May 20, causing a change in the region’s delicate strategic balance.
Recent interaction between Taipei and Beijing had apparently led to grave misunderstandings in the international community, Cheng said. Rice’s comments ought to make the Ma administration think about the position it must take as it engages further with China, he said.
Cheng also commented on speculation that National Security Council Secretary-General Su Chi (蘇起) asked the US to delay Taiwan’s military procurement package in order to create a more harmonious cross-strait atmosphere.
Cheng yesterday said that if this were true, it would sound “unbelievable” to the country’s diplomatic allies.
“It is stupid to abandon the country’s defense and diplomatic autonomy and put them on the negotiating table as a bargaining chip simply for the sake of creating a better atmosphere,” he said.
“We hope President Ma’s national security team understands what the mainstream view in the international community is,” Cheng said.
Listen to the voice
can't afford Chinese ‘gifts’
By Paul Lin 林保華
Tuesday, Jun 24, 2008, Page 8
As talks were being conducted between Taiwan’s Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) and China’s Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait (ARATS) in Beijing, the Chinese-language Hong Kong newspaper Ming Pao published an article on June 13 entitled “How should Ma repay China for its big gifts?”
The piece said that President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) first step in repaying China should be to stop desinicization and increase cross-strait exchanges. Beijing should be satisfied with the Ma government’s first month in office, it said, because it stopped the issuance of postage stamps with “Taiwan” written on them, vowed to reopen the Tzuhu Presidential Mausoleum of dictator Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and announced that the public will be able to exchange the yuan for New Taiwan dollars.
The article also asked how Ma should repay China if Taiwan is given more freedom internationally. When it comes to independence and unification, the Ming Pao toes the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) line, so we should not overlook these comments.
The cross-strait talks — resumed under the aegis of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-CCP cooperation — are an outright political transaction. The aforementioned “good news” generated by the Ma government is bad news for Taiwanese interests, as Ma had to make sacrifices to bring it about. These cross-strait talks are not about being “fair,” nor are they about “putting aside disputes” as some say: China is trying to take away Taiwan’s sovereignty and Taiwan is sacrificing its own interests.
When China reorganized ARATS, the new position of executive vice chairman was established under the original positions of chairman and standing vice chairman. This meant that the SEF’s second-in-charge, secretary-general Kao Koong-lian (高孔廉), would have to deal with ARATS’ third-in-charge, vice president Sun Yafu (孫亞夫). The message from China is that Taiwan is merely a local government.
China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs has demanded that the US permanently stop selling weapons to Taiwan. When a Taiwanese boat sank near the Diaoyutai islands after being hit by the Japanese coast guard patrol boat, China beat out Taiwan in displaying dissatisfaction toward Japan and used the name “Chinese Taiwan” to represent Taiwan — or was Taiwan just deliberately slow in reacting?
While Taiwan is not pushing the issue of sovereignty or the idea of “one China with each side having its own interpretations,” China on the other hand has not given in at all on their “one China” policy.
Beijing is no doubt satisfied with Ma’s performance. If he has to repay China for the “big gifts” they have bestowed upon Taiwan, does this mean he will have to openly kowtow to China and recognize it as king? Or will it mean that Ma must keep pleasing China in terms of Taiwan’s relations with Japan and the US?
All the talk about “big gifts” from China is flawed. It is the result of erroneous reports that have been circulated through media that are sympathetic to China and unification.
The value of sacrifices made by Taiwan in terms of sovereignty is already larger in value than China’s “big gifts,” which are really just tourists coming to Taiwan and chartered direct flights. Taiwan allowed tourists to go to China in the 1980s; and countless Taiwanese businessmen invested there after the Tiananmen Square Massacre, helping to save a Chinese economy that was starting to slip at that time. Now, there are millions of Taiwanese residing in China and Taiwanese have invested hundreds of billions of dollars there. Yet when a few thousand Chinese are set to come to Taiwan for a holiday, China calls it a “big gift.” Does this mean all that Taiwan has given China didn’t amount to anything? It is high time China cultivated some virtue and a little class and repay Taiwan instead.
The three links and direct flights between Taiwan and China are merely things China needs in its battle to “unite” with Taiwan. Taiwan’s response has been to take things a step at a time. But in the end, China suddenly turned around and gave Taiwan trouble with chartered flights. Now they are referring to these flights as a “big gift.” So how can we afford not to be vigilant in dealing with such an ungrateful, blackmailing, rogue government like the CCP?
For China, Ma may very well only be someone they refer to as “Mr Ma,” but to the Taiwanese, he is president. As president, Ma is considering whether to hand Taiwan over to China and just how much he is willing to give away. Taiwanese are anxiously watching to see how far he will go before deciding whether or not they want to keep supporting him.
Paul Lin is a political commentator based in Taiwan.