Influence of China
holds back media freedom
By Lu I-ming 呂一銘
On Monday last week, Taiwan Democracy Watch released the results of a poll on
the top 10 democracy-related events, which showed that the primary concern among
those polled was the continued threat to freedom of expression. The results also
contained a list of five influential factors on democracy and third on this list
was the “China factor.”
This deserves further exploration.
Recently, the perennial question of whether Chunghwa Telecom will renew New Tang
Dynasty Asia Pacific Television’s (NTDTV) broadcasting contract has once more
hit the headlines, suggesting that the decision to renew is more than a simply
When asked to comment on the matter, Youth Alliance Against Media Monsters
spokesman Wu Hsueh-chan (吳學展) said: “NDTV is able to broadcast ideas about
freedom within China. The government in Taiwan is basically getting in the way
of this happening, it is obstructing attempts to help China become more
democratic and free.”
In the past few weeks, the public was informed by legislators that Great Wall
Asia Television — a satellite TV package featuring 11 Chinese channels — has
arrived in Taiwan through a back door. A worrying development that has the
fingerprints of Chinese officials all over it.
According to the Act Governing Relations between the Peoples of the Taiwan Area
and the Mainland Area (台灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例) and the Satellite Broadcasting Act
(衛星廣播電視法), local branches of overseas satellite broadcasting companies require a
license to operate in Taiwan.
The law states this very clearly, it is just that the government is not
listening, whether it be the National Communications Commission, the Mainland
Affairs Council or the Ministry of Culture.
According to this year’s Freedom of the Press report — compiled by
non-governmental organization Freedom House — even though Taiwan’s media
environment is one of the freest in Asia, the polarization of politics, media
self-censorship and the indirect influence of Beijing all conspire to constrain
the diversity of ideas within mainstream media.
According to Karin Karlekar, the project director responsible for the report,
the new generation of leaders in China have strengthened their grip on China’s
media since the handover of power earlier this year.
For example, a report in Hong Kong’s Chinese-language Mingpao News, has revealed
how the Chinese authorities have given professors at universities in Beijing and
Shanghai a list of seven banned topics, which include universal values, press
freedom, judicial independence, civil rights, civil society, historical errors
committed by the Chinese Communist Party and the powerful capitalist elite.
The move caused a stir among the online community.
An article entitled “Keeping the doctor away,” published last month in The
Economist, reported that President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) China-friendly policies
are giving rise to concerns about press freedom in Taiwan. The article said that
despite the acquisition deal of the Next Media Group’s print outlets having been
abruptly stopped, “surprisingly few are satisfied by this apparent triumph for
This turn for the worse in the nation’s media environment is, of course, related
to the wider environment and the agents working within it, but even more than
this, the decline in press freedom is related to the “China factor.”
Taiwan is in dire need of an anti-monopoly media law, which is crucial for the
maintenance of press freedom.
Lu I-ming is a former publisher and president of the Taiwan Shin Sheng Daily
Translated by Paul Cooper